Educational Psychologist (journal): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 65: Line 65:

[[Category:Routledge academic journals]]

[[Category:Routledge academic journals]]

[[Category:English-language journals]]

[[Category:English-language journals]]

[[Category:Academic journals established in 1963]]


Latest revision as of 23:52, 3 January 2026

Academic journal

The Educational Psychologist is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by Routledge on behalf of Division 15 (Educational Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. It was established in 1963. The journal publishes conceptual, theoretical, and review articles (including meta-analyses), rather than empirical studies, on all aspects of educational psychology and learning in formal and informal educational environments.

It is considered one of the “big five” educational psychology journals (along with Cognition and Instruction, Educational Psychology Review, Journal of Educational Psychology, and Contemporary Educational Psychology).[1] According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2024 impact factor of 11.4.[2]

The journal practices double-blind peer review (since at least 1979).[3]

The following persons have been editors-in-chief:

  1. ^ Mitchell, Anita; McConnell, John (2012). “A historical review of Contemporary Educational Psychology from 1995 to 2010”. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 37 (2): 136–147. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.11.001.
  2. ^ “Educational Psychologist”. 2024 Journal Citation Reports (Social Sciences ed.). Clarivate. 2025 – via Web of Science.
  3. ^ “Instructions to Authors”. Educational Psychologist. 14 (1): 2. 1979.
  4. ^ Ripple, Richard (1969). “From the (new) editor”. Educational Psychologist. 7 (1): 2. doi:10.1080/00461526909528996.
  5. ^ Ripple, Richard (1972). “From the editor”. Educational Psychologist. 9 (3): 34. doi:10.1080/00461527209529076.
  6. ^ Feldhusen, John (1973). “Division business”. Educational Psychologist. 10 (1): 36–43. doi:10.1080/00461527309529087.
  7. ^ Shuell, Thomas (1979). “Editorial”. Educational Psychologist. 14 (1): 1. doi:10.1080/00461527909529201.
  8. ^ Weinstein, Claire (1992). “Past Editor’s Comment”. Educational Psychologist. 27 (1): 3. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_2.
  9. ^ Salomon, Gavriel (1992). “Editor’s Comment”. Educational Psychologist. 27 (1): 1. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_1.
  10. ^ Pintrich, Paul (1995). “Editor’s Comment”. Educational Psychologist. 30 (4): 171–172. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_1.
  11. ^ Corno, Lyn; Winne, Philip (2001). “Editor’s Statement”. Educational Psychologist. 36 (4): 225. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3604_1. S2CID 218510419.
  12. ^ a b Corno, Lyn; Winne, Philip (2006). “Outgoing Editors’ Statement”. Educational Psychologist. 41 (1): 1. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_1. S2CID 144709567.
  13. ^ Sinatra, Gale (2011). “Outgoing Editor’s Statement”. Educational Psychologist. 46 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538834. S2CID 146580300.
  14. ^ Chinn, Clark (2011). “Editor’s Statement”. Educational Psychologist. 46 (1): 3–5. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.539063. S2CID 218509659.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top