Where to get help
Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
|
 |
Comment: Wikipedia is not a reliable source so should not be used. All of the other sources are by the same author and this is written in first-person narrative and/or an essay which is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. S0091 (talk) 21:05, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
The philosophy of digitalization
Digital Manifesto of the 21st Century
From Latin manifestum—”clear, evident”
The Digital Manifesto of the 21st Century is a programmatic document or declaration that proclaims the principles, objectives, and demands of the movement for human rights in the digital environment. The manifesto critiques the exploitation of users’ attention, data, and time by digital platforms and calls for algorithmic transparency, equitable revenue distribution, and the prioritization of human values over the interests of digital corporations.
Contents
Prologue
Objectives
I. Classes of the Digital Age
II. Digital Capital and Its Crises
III. The Algorithmic Throne and Algorithmic Servitude
IV. Globalization as Invasion
V. Trends in Digital Exploitation
VI. Driving Forces of the Digital Manifesto
Prologue
A specter is haunting the world—the specter of digital globalization. In every corner of the planet, on every screen, and within every soul, its silent drum resounds: giant corporations, platforms, and algorithms weave a new web, capturing the attention, lives, and dreams of billions. Humanity has become the arena of this great struggle. Two conclusions emerge from this fact:
Digitalization is recognized as a force capable of restructuring society entirely.
It is time to openly articulate the essence of this force, its objectives, and true consequences.
Beneath the guise of progress and convenience lies the iron grip of a new capital: digital, ruthless, insatiable. It has commodified attention, turned every mouse movement into currency, and every emotion into fuel for its profit machines. Yet, the human being is not a commodity, not a digit in algorithmic registries, but a creator, bearer of freedom, and master of their own mind.
Objectives
We, the digital proletariat, must recognize our power. Our task is to reclaim control over our data, attention, and time; to carve out space for free, meaningful creativity; to cease being mere resources for algorithms and become subjects of our own digital destiny. We have nothing to lose but our digital chains. We must build a world where technology serves humanity, not the other way around. Let algorithms tremble before our resolve. Long live digital freedom!
I. Classes of the Digital Age
The history of digital society is a history of struggle between those who control data and those governed by it. Algorithms and users, platforms and their audiences—an antagonism masked by friendly interfaces. The bourgeoisie of the 21st century comprises digital corporations and platform owners consolidating power and capital through data. They have transformed users’ personal stories, views, and emotions into commodities sold on the attention market.
The digital bourgeoisie—platform owners, corporations, and tech giants—have centralized power within digital ecosystems. They exploit personal data as primary capital and user attention as an inexhaustible source of enrichment. Every click and like is a brick in the palace of digital magnates. Each online interaction is an invisible thread linking user interests to monopolistic agendas.
Who, then, is the digital proletariat? Users subjected to algorithms’ hidden objectives; content creators laboring for “visibility” without fair compensation; those whose digital lives have become servitude to algorithms and endless scrolling. The digital proletariat fuels digital capital with their data and time. Bloggers, professionals, and independent authors are compelled to work for “visibility” in algorithmically governed spaces. Just as factory workers once became appendages to machines, individuals now become extensions of algorithms—elements in a system of infinite scrolling and clicks. Each moment online capitalizes on your time, attention, emotions, and ideas.
II. Digital Capital and Its Crises
The age of factories has given way to the age of servers. Algorithms are the new manufacturers; their looms are news feeds; their whip is the endless scroll. The digital bourgeoisie, owning platforms and code, rules invisibly yet inexorably. They replace human will with machine directives, subordinating all life spheres to a singular law: “Monetize or vanish!”
Below lies the digital proletariat: millions of users, bloggers, moderators, data workers. Their labor is invisible, yet it sustains the data palaces. They generate content, emotions, meanings—but the fruits of their labor are harvested by digital capital, growing like a pyramid over humanity.
Just as past bourgeoisies spawned crises of overproduction, today’s digital bourgeoisie engenders crises of attention oversaturation. Content multiplies, while communication quality diminishes. Information becomes noise; freedom of choice becomes illusion. Algorithms process everything: creativity, relationships, even leisure. They recognize no boundaries, yet such boundaries are essential for humanity.
III. The Algorithmic Throne and Algorithmic Servitude
The history of the digital age is the history of new dominion: the power of those who own algorithms and code. The digital bourgeoisie sits upon a throne forged from lines of code and data streams. They govern invisibly; their crowns are app icons; their armies are neural networks and hidden protocols.
Below lies the silent swarm of users, creators, moderators—the digital proletariat, whose time and attention are the new currency. Their labor is dispersed, unseen, yet it nourishes this algorithmic palace. Every click, word, and like is a brick in this digital empire’s wall.
Global digital corporations like Google, Meta, Amazon, and TikTok are not merely economic entities but new power centers shaping economic, cultural, and political processes globally.
Algorithms are the new chains—not forged of iron but woven from code and data. They promise personalization but create cages: filters, bubbles, attention traps. Each like and click is another hammer strike, another step toward subjugation. Emotions become profit. Anger is sold. Joy is sold. Love is sold. Thus arises the realm of digital exploitation: without factory smoke, but with server fumes; without machine clatter, but with the din of likes and reposts.
IV. Globalization as Invasion
Digital globalization rushes forth like an avalanche, crushing cultural walls, subsuming languages and traditions. It promises the world convenience, access, opportunities. Yet its true face is greed: all that peoples have created becomes merchandise; all that was sacred becomes bait for likes.
It pledges convenience, but beneath its mantle lies omnipotence. Every culture, every nation is merely a market for new algorithms; every soul is a digit in an endless profit spreadsheet.
Localization is a fragile bastion of memory and pride. Translations and local interfaces are straw shields attempting to shelter from the hurricane of global ambitions. Too often, this protection conceals a new form of subjugation—where the “local” becomes just another commodity, another reason to buy and sell.
Localization? Merely a temporary barrier through which capital penetrates even deeper. Each translation is a new assault; each local office is a new garrison of the digital empire. Glocalization is the battlefield where dreams of freedom clash with chains of dependency.
Glocalization is the offspring of these collisions. It merges the song of the homeland with the voice of the global ether. It offers culture a chance to survive—but also threatens to turn it into a product on the digital supermarket shelf.
V. Trends in Digital Exploitation
Modern digital exploitation is not static but a dynamic phenomenon, constantly evolving and transforming. Its evolution is defined by several key trends that deepen exploitation and intensify the contradictions of digital society.
Firstly, there is a deepening of algorithmic control. Modern algorithms, leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence, become increasingly complex and opaque to users. This “black box” of algorithms heightens power asymmetry: users and content creators lose the ability to understand how their digital reality is shaped. Consequently, dependence on platforms intensifies, leading to burnout cycles and the “race for reach.”
Another significant process is the globalization of digital exploitation. Transnational corporations create global monopolies, forming unified digital ecosystems that transcend national borders. Local economies and cultures become entangled in these ecosystems, becoming dependent on infrastructure and services located beyond their sovereignty. This exacerbates income disparities and strengthens the monopoly position of the digital bourgeoisie.
Simultaneously, there is a commodification of emotions and interpersonal connections. Digital platforms increasingly exploit users’ emotional states. Algorithms deliberately promote content that provokes strong emotions—fear, anger, joy—as this content most effectively retains attention. Personal relationships become “digital currency“—likes, comments, and views become indicators of “success,” distorting genuine interpersonal connections and values.
At the same time, digital inequality deepens. The digital divide between social groups—in access to technology and the ability to critically navigate the digital environment—means that the most vulnerable groups become prime targets for manipulative algorithms. The uneven distribution of digital economy revenues also grows: the majority of profits go to platforms, while the labor of authors, moderators, and users remains undervalued and undercompensated.
An important trend is the automation and invisibility of labor that ensures the functioning of the digital economy. Content moderators and micro-workers (e.g., anonymous “trainers” of artificial intelligence) perform mentally and physically exhausting work, remaining behind the scenes of public attention. Their labor is another example of exploitation, hidden behind the convenient and “free” interfaces of digital services.
These processes are accompanied by the concentration and centralization of digital power. Platforms increasingly act as “private states,” establishing their own rules and standards of interaction, often superseding national laws. Thus, the digital bourgeoisie becomes the new regulator of public communications, and digital exploitation becomes a tool not only of economic but also of cultural, social, and political control.
All these trends together demonstrate that digital exploitation is not a temporary phenomenon but a persistent and deepening feature of modern society. It penetrates the most intimate spheres of human life: emotions, relationships, identity. The key task of critical science and civil society is to identify these processes and propose ways to overcome them, enabling the preservation of human dignity, autonomy, and freedom in the digital age.
VI. Driving Forces of the Digital Manifesto
The Digital Manifesto is not only a critical reaction to the exploitative nature of the digital economy but also a program for the transformation of digital society. Its driving forces emerge from within the digital environment itself, rooted in new needs, challenges, and opportunities.
First and foremost, a key driving force is the growing awareness of digital alienation. Millions of users are beginning to understand that their attention and data are not free resources, but rather sources of profit that do not provide them with fair compensation or control. There is a realization that freedom in the digital realm is illusory, and that algorithmic filtering and concealed models of governance are modern instruments of social subjugation.
Secondly, there is an increasingly apparent demand for informational transparency. Users and societies are calling for the explicability and openness of algorithms that shape their perceptions of the world. Transparency represents a crucial step towards restoring individual autonomy and collective control over digital infrastructures.
Thirdly, among the driving forces of the Digital Manifesto, significant importance is given to alternative forms of digital solidarity and collective action. This includes the development of cooperative platforms, horizontally structured communities, and digital unions that advocate for the rights of content creators, moderators, and all participants in the digital economy.
Fourthly, a critical driving force is the need to restore the human dimension of communication. The Digital Manifesto asserts the priority of meaningful interaction over manipulation of attention, and the priority of social well-being over short-term profit. In this context, key tasks include the development of digital ethics and the fostering of a culture of conscious content consumption.
Finally, a driving force of the manifesto is the necessity for the equitable redistribution of digital rent. The platform economy concentrates resources in the hands of a few, and the Digital Manifesto declares the need for redistribution of these revenues in the interests of users and society. This is a challenge to the logic of digital capitalism, which is built upon the exploitation of attention and data.
Thus, the Digital Manifesto draws its strength from new forms of digital consciousness and critical reflection, from the need of users for genuine freedom and dignity, and from the pursuit of a just and open digital future. It combines scientific understanding, social protest, and creative energy, which together form a foundation for resisting digital exploitation and building a society in which technology serves humanity, and not the other way around.
Let the digital proletariat realize its power! Let everyone who is tired of being reduced to mere attention and data rise with this cry: “We are not commodities! We are not products for machine-driven profit! We are creators, we are individuals, we are the future!” Let platforms and corporations tremble! Let them understand that the new masters of technology will not rule forever. Humanity demands the return of its rights: the right to freedom, dignity, and self-expression in the digital world. Let the uprising begin where each of us declares: “I am a person, not an algorithm. My attention is mine, my data is mine, my life is mine!” Let technology serve humanity—let a new digital freedom reign!
DIGITAL PROLETARIANS OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!
Natalya Berezhnaya
“Castells, Manuel.” Russian Wikipedia, n.d., https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Кастельс,_Мануэль.
“Harari, Yuval Noah.” Russian Wikipedia, n.d., https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Харари,_Юваль_Ной.
Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age_of_Surveillance_Capitalism.
“Habermas, Jürgen.” Russian Wikipedia, n.d., https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Хабермас,_Юрген.
Berezhnaya, N. V. “Algorithmic Thinking and the Crisis of Critical Rationality.” Current Issues of Modern Scientific Research, vol. 2, 2025, pp. 109–112. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=82146994.
Berezhnaya, N. V. “Freedom of Science as an Indicator of Epistemological Rationality and Current Social Realities.” Modern Science as a Factor and Resource of Advanced Development, 2024, pp. 41–45. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=69194695.
Berezhnaya, N. V. “Reflection of Philosophy on ‘Conspiracy Theories’ in the Modern Post-Pandemic Crisis.” Current Issues of Modern Science, 2024, pp. 62–66. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=71921073.
Berezhnaya, N. V., and T. V. Lugutsenko. “Philosophy of Inclusiveness and the Crisis of Security in Modern Civilization.” Current Scientific Research, 2024, pp. 85–87. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=69196439.
Berezhnaya, N. V. “Philosophical Reflection on Modern Civilization: Demographic Problems and Socio-Cultural Changes.” Current Issues of Modern Science and Education, 2022, pp. 135–137. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49382874.
Worldview and Scientific Knowledge in the Second Decade of the 21st Century. Rostov-on-Don, 2021. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45832247.
Berezhnaya, N. V. “Chapter 3. Philosophical Discourse on the Socio-Cultural Consequences of the Global Pandemic.” Innovative Development of Science and Education, edited by S. K. Alidjanov, 2021, pp. 43–52. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45832247.
Berezhnaya, N. V. “Digital – Personality – Pandemic: The Problem of a Unified World Identity.” Modernization of Russian Society and Education, 2021, pp. 656–658. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46337000.
