Draft talk:Mediplus: Difference between revisions

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation’s Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Mediplus Ltd for the creation of the Mediplus wikipedia page Johnperkins121 (talk) 08:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully disagree with the deletion tag under CSD A7. While the article currently includes regulatory listings such as FDA establishment and BSI certification, the subject also meets Wikipedia’s notability threshold because there are reliable, independent secondary sources that discuss the company and its products in context beyond marketing materials. Regulatory listings are verifiable, but I will add independent clinical evaluations to further support notability.

I plan to add references from reputable clinical sources that analyse Mediplus’s devices or their impact on clinical practice. With those, the article will clearly satisfy Wikipedia’s notability requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnperkins121 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have added two further independent references in addition to the regulatory listings on the FDA and BSI websites. I now believe this article will clearly satisfy Wikipedia’s notability requirements. Johnperkins121 (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]