Draft talk:Winston Utomo: Difference between revisions

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia WikiProject Media To-do List: This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia

Hello, I have rewritten this draft with improved sourcing and neutral tone.
The article now relies on multiple independent secondary sources.

I would appreciate a review to assess whether it meets notability
and Wikipedia content guidelines.

Thank you. Dinimaharani4403 (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have rewritten this draft with improved sourcing and neutral tone. The article now relies on multiple independent secondary sources. I would appreciate a review to assess whether it meets notability and Wikipedia content guidelines. Thank you. Marcella Anindita (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Greenman! Hope you’re doing well.

Thank you for the advice about the draft of Winston Utomo [English Version]. I have revised this draft to improve its neutral tone and encyclopedic style, and to rely on multiple independent, reliable secondary sources. I would appreciate a review to assess whether it meets Wikipedia’s notability and content guidelines. Thank you.

Best Regrads,
Cella Marcella Anindita (talk) 04:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Youshouldchooseausernamethat, I have revised this draft to address previous feedback by adopting a more encyclopedic tone, reducing résumé-style content, and relying on independent secondary sources. I would appreciate a review to assess whether it now meets Wikipedia’s notability and content guidelines. Thank you. Marcella Anindita (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you specify which draft please. Thank you.

My apologies. I thought this was a user talk page as it appeared that way on my mobile view. Youshouldchooseausernamethat (Youshouldtalk) 20:54, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]