Draft:Butterflies of Bill Baker: Difference between revisions

This may take 5 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,056 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Declined by LaMona 9 years ago. Last edited by DareshMohan 4 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

• Comment: I agree with the previous assessment. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

• Comment: Right now at this point in time the film does not meet notability guidelines. It has screened at a film festival, but it never seemed to gain any reviews or coverage other than a handful of sources that really didn’t go into any true depth. I think that the best option here is to wait until the upcoming release and then see if it garners more coverage then. It did win awards, but none of them are really the type that would let the article pass WP:NFILM on that basis alone and besides, both are unsourced by anything other than primary websites.I’ve edited the article heavily since the prior version not only contained copyright violations but it also was not laid out in the format that Wikipedia prefers. I’ve removed a lot of primary sources from the article and put some of them in the external links section.The thing is, primary sources like the official website and social media pages cannot show notability for the film and in general it’s best to only include one official link for the film. It’s generally assumed that the average official website will contain all of the important links for the various social media sites, which is the case here, and adding in a ton of social media sites can have the unintended side effect of making the article seem promotional.So right now it’s basically a waiting game for sources. It’s somewhat surprising that this didn’t get at least 1-2 reviews given the cast members, but it does happen. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• NOTE The account that created this draft is Running Bear Media, which incidentally happens to be the name of the distribution company involved in the film. On the strength of this observation, the editor has been blocked pending a name change or the registering of a new account. Please keep this in mind when dealing with the contributor. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Butterflies of Bill Baker is a 2013 psychological drama and the feature film directorial debut of Sania Jhankar.^[1] The film had its world premiere on 29 June 2013 at the Manhattan Film Festival, where it won the MFF Award for Best Alternative Feature.^[2]

Bill Baker (Will Chase) is a sensitive man that spends his days peacefully working in his garden but his nights suffering from severe night terrors that cause him to act out while he sleeps. After one particularly violent episode Bill’s wife Emma (Marin Hinkle) leaves him, which forces Bill to seek ways to potentially cure himself of the terrors. There is a treatment, but it is highly experimental and very dangerous and this leaves Bill with only the hope that he will eventually find a way to get his wife back. However soon Bill meets Annie (Sterling Jerins), a 10-year old girl that may prove the key to solving his night terrors and making his life happier.

Butterflies of Bill Baker marks the directorial debut of Sania Jhankar, whose father, Ajay Jhankar, wrote the script, which she subsequently translated. According to Sania Jhankar, the film has a universal story and she set it in New York since she lived there for ten years.^[3]

The film was released in India at the Kolhapur International Film Festival in December 2013^[4] and the NFAI on 23 December 2014.^[3]