{{Draft article}}
{{Draft article}}
{{Under review}}
{{Under review}}
{{Infobox philosophy
{Infobox philosophy
| title = The New Logic of Form – Hayawic (UniLogic)
| title = The New Logic of Form – Hayawic (UniLogic)
| notable_ideas = Hayawic Logic (المنطق الحيوي), UniLogic, Interest Square Unit (مربع المصالح)
| notable_ideas = Hayawic Logic (المنطق الحيوي), UniLogic, Interest Square Unit (مربع المصالح)
| influenced = [[Yasmine Alnakari]], [[David C. Rine]]
| influenced = [[Yasmine Alnakari]], [[David C. Rine]]
| influenced_by = [[René Schérer]], [[Roger Garaudy]], [[Gilles Deleuze]], [[Pierre Tillet]]
| influenced_by = [[René Schérer]], [[Roger Garaudy]], [[Gilles Deleuze]], [[Pierre Tillet]]
}}
}
== 1. Introduction ==
== 1. Introduction ==
Where to get help
Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
|
 |
💬 Extended Article Description (English): The New Logic of Form – Hayawic (UniLogic) is a contempor
This template is only intended for use in mainspace.
{Infobox philosophy
| title = The New Logic of Form – Hayawic (UniLogic)
| notable_ideas = Hayawic Logic (المنطق الحيوي), UniLogic, Interest Square Unit (مربع المصالح)
| influenced = Yasmine Alnakari, David C. Rine
| influenced_by = René Schérer, Roger Garaudy, Gilles Deleuze, Pierre Tillet
}
The New Logic of Form – Hayawic (UniLogic) (Arabic: المنطق الحيوي التوحيدي للشكل) is a contemporary philosophical and scientific framework developed by Raiek Alnakari (رائق النقري) and expanded by Yasmine Alnakari (ياسمين النقري).
It proposes that form (الشكل) is not a static structure but a vital unifying logic — a living dynamic that organizes all existence through motion, relation, and transformation.[1]
The Hayawic (حيوي) UniLogic reinterprets form beyond both Aristotelian and Platonic traditions.
For Alnakari, form is neither a passive essence (hylomorphism) nor a transcendent ideal (eidos), but a universal process of formation and transformation governing all beings — material or spiritual, organic or artificial, sacred or profane.[2]
> “Every being is not merely having a form, but is itself a form — even when it appears formless.” — Raiek Alnakari
This concept transforms form from a metaphysical abstraction into a bio-hayawic law of vitality, describing existence as an ever-renewing network of dynamic relations among living interests.[3]
3. The Five Universal Laws of Hayawic Logic
[edit]
From this bio-hayawic foundation, Raiek Alnakari formulated five universal laws defining the UniLogic of Form:
- Every being is form-like, even if it appears formless.
- Every form is dynamic (both mover and moved), even if it appears still.
- Every form is inclusively vital (whole and partial at once), even if it appears empty or dead.
- Every being is probabilistic (necessity and coincidence at once), even if it appears certain.
- Every being is relative (universal and particular at once), even if it seems absolute.
4. Academic Background
[edit]
Raiek Alnakari first articulated this UniLogic in his Doctorat d’État dissertation Le principe hayawi dans la pensée philosophique et politique arabe contemporaine (Université Paris 8, 1984).
It was evaluated by Pierre Tillet, who described it as “a radically new category in the history of philosophy, breaking the classical Greek dualism between matter and spirit.”
[5]
5. Research at George Washington University (1993–1995)
[edit]
Between 1993 and 1995, Raiek Alnakari served as a Visiting Scholar in Human Science at Columbia College / Graduate School of Arts & Sciences, George Washington University, Washington D.C.
His research project, titled “UniLogic Form Research in Natural and Human Sciences,” extended the Hayawic UniLogic into a transdisciplinary model unifying biological, psychological, and social sciences.
[6]
> “We are not in the Age of Information but in the Age of Form.” — Lecture delivered at George Washington University, 1994.
6. Modern Applications
[edit]
In 1998, Marguerite J. Palmer (Peggy Palmer), researcher and officer at the U.S. Department of Defense (Pentagon), applied Alnakari’s four-valued logic model to electronic-circuit diagnosis at George Mason University.
Her work influenced the IEEE publication by David C. Rine and Raiek Alnakari (2000): “A Four-Valued Logic B(4) of E(9) for Modeling Human Communication.”
[7]
[8]
7. Comparative Evaluation
[edit]
According to the annexed reports of Yasmine Alnakari’s doctoral thesis (Université Paris 8, 2019):
- Pierre Tiéhé observed that Raiek Alnakari’s theory “proposes a radically new philosophical foundation that overturns both Greek and Western traditions of thought.”
- René Schérer described the Hayawic UniLogic as “a profound epistemological rupture with classical metaphysics” and “a functional system applicable to both human and artificial intelligence.”
8. Reception and Independent Studies
[edit]
Michel Seurat (1980), in La Syrie d’aujourd’hui (CNRS / CERMOC), discussed Râ’iq al-Nuqarî (Raiek Alnakari), describing his “vitalist intellectual production” and its role in Syrian ideological and academic circles.
Al-Baʿth Newspaper (Damascus, 1974) reported a University of Damascus symposium on Al-Insān Shakl (Man is Form), which featured academic debate around Alnakari’s theory of vital form.
Ammar Ayyash (Université de Ouargla, 2017) explored La théorie hayawique de la connaissance chez Raïk Al-Nakari, analyzing the epistemological framework of Hayawic Logic as an alternative to Western materialism and idealism.
[11]
[12]
[13]
9. Legacy and Influence
[edit]
The New Logic of Form – Hayawic (حيوي) – UniLogic has influenced philosophical, educational, and scientific research across Arab and Western academia.
It serves as a transdisciplinary bridge between metaphysics, cognition, ethics, systems theory, and artificial intelligence.
[14]
- ^ Alnakari, Raiek (1984). Le principe hayawi dans la pensée philosophique et politique arabe contemporaine. Doctorat d’État, Université Paris 8.
- ^ Tillet, Pierre (1984). Doctoral jury report on Le principe hayawi. Université Paris 8.
- ^ Alnakari, Raiek (1987). Al-Manṭiq al-Ḥayawī [Hayawic Logic]. Paris: Dar al-Dirasat al-ʿArabiyya al-Duwaliyya.
- ^ Alnakari, Raiek (1987). Al-Manṭiq al-Ḥayawī [Hayawic Logic]. Paris: Dar al-Dirasat al-ʿArabiyya al-Duwaliyya.
- ^ Tillet, Pierre (1984). Doctoral jury report on Le principe hayawi. Université Paris 8.
- ^ George Washington University Archives (1995). Visiting Scholar record: Raiek Alnakari, Columbia College / Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.
- ^ Palmer, Marguerite J. (1998). Applications of Hayawic Logic in Error Detection for Electronic Circuits. George Mason University (U.S. Department of Defense).
- ^ Rine, David C.; Alnakari, Raiek (2000). A Four-Valued Logic B(4) of E(9) for Modeling Human Communication. IEEE ISMVL, Washington D.C.
- ^ Tiéhé, Pierre (2019). Report on L’Unité Carrée des Intérêts (ISU). Université Paris 8, Annex 1.
- ^ Schérer, René (2019). Report on L’Unité Carrée des Intérêts (ISU). Université Paris 8, Annex 2.
- ^ Seurat, Michel (1980). La Syrie d’aujourd’hui. CNRS / CERMOC, Paris, p. 247.
- ^ Al-Baʿth Newspaper (Damascus). “Symposium at University of Damascus about Al-Insān Shakl.” October 22, 1974.
- ^ Ayyash, Ammar (2017). La théorie hayawique de la connaissance chez Raïk Al-Nakari. Université Kasdi Merbah, Ouargla.
- ^ Alnakari, Raiek (1987). Al-Manṭiq al-Ḥayawī [Hayawic Logic]. Paris: Dar al-Dirasat al-ʿArabiyya al-Duwaliyya.
