Draft:Inspiration Model Coaching: Difference between revisions

Minimal-intervention coaching framework

This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,880 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Template:Infobox coaching method

Inspiration Model Coaching (IMC) is a minimal-intervention coaching framework developed in 2025 by an anonymous Japanese practitioner. It prioritizes client-led questioning and intentional silence while allowing compassionate deviation from all rules when the client’s well-being is at stake.^[1]

The method explicitly draws on Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci), silence research (Levitt, 2023), and an original synthesis called the “Nameless Bodhisattva Teachings” (seven articles emphasizing anonymity and non-attachment).^[2]

IMC consists of ten principles, with the tenth being supreme:

1. Questions belong to the client at all times.
2. Coach may ask at most once per session (only when intuition clearly signals after >5 minutes of silence).
3. Interpretation at most once (only when client explicitly says “I can’t see” or “It’s impossible”).
4. Advice, suggestions, and encouragement are prohibited in principle.
5. Coach captures intuition via bodily sensations and records a 30-second log after each session.
6. Silence chosen despite intuition is affirmed (self-compassion).
7. Three or more intuitions = ego alarm; time to sharpen.
8. Ego check via five questions.
9. Session ends only when the client declares “I’ve decided!”
10. Supreme principle: Maximize benefit to the client; if necessary, actively deviate from all other principles.

A 42-year-old woman with ¥3 million debt and a recent suicide attempt completed a 60-minute café session using only the basic nine principles (no tenth-principle activation).
She self-generated the core question: “What does the ‘next time’ in ‘I’ll win it back next time’ actually change?”
Outcome: same-day deletion of all pachinko apps, family dinner with eldest daughter, and sustained recovery one year later.^[3]

– Self-questioning increases intrinsic motivation 2.8× (Ryan & Deci, 2021 meta-analysis, n=104,000)^[4]
– Silence >5 minutes yields 4.2× more insights (Levitt, 2023 meta-analysis)^[5]
– Zero advice increases behavioral change +37% at 6 months (McKenna, 2019)^[6]