Draft:Kerr v Danier Leather Inc: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 15: Line 15:

==References==

==References==

<references />

<references />

[[Category:Supreme Court of Canada cases]]

[[Category:Supreme Court of Canada cases]]

[[Category:2007 in Canadian case law]]

[[Category:2007 in Canadian case law]]

{{Drafts moved from mainspace|date=October 2025}}

{{Drafts moved from mainspace|date=October 2025}}


Latest revision as of 13:46, 23 October 2025

Kerr v Danier Leather Inc [2007] 3 S.C.R. 331 , 2007 SCC 44[1] is a 2007 Supreme Court of Canada decision which speaks to the Business Judgement rule.

Danier made an initial public offering of its shares through a prospectus.  The prospectus contained a forecast that included Danier’s projected results for the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.  An internal company analysis prepared before its public offering closed showed that Danier’s fourth quarter results were lagging behind its forecast.  Danier did not disclose its intra‑quarterly results before closing. 

The appellants therefore brought a class proceeding for prospectus misrepresentation under s. 130(1) of the Ontario Securities Act.  The trial judge found Danier liable for statutory misrepresentation.  He concluded that the prospectus impliedly represented that the forecast was objectively reasonable, both on the date the prospectus was filed and on the date the public offering closed.  The poor fourth quarter results were material facts required by s. 130(1) to be disclosed before closing. 

The implied representation that the forecast was objectively reasonable, though true on the date the prospectus was filed, was false on the closing date. 

The Court of Appeal, however, reversed the trial judgment.

Held:  The appeal should be dismissed.[1]

Category:Supreme Court of Canada cases
Category:2007 in Canadian case law

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version