Dupree v. Younger: Difference between revisions

2023 United States Supreme Court case

Dupree v. Younger, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment.^[1][2]

• Text of Dupree v. Younger, No. 22-210, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.