{{Short description|Spanish theologian and archbishop}}
{{Short description|Spanish theologian and archbishop}}
{{More citations needed|date=June 2012}}
[[File:Clm 14510, fol. 78r.jpg|thumb|A letter dated to 792 from [[Charlemagne]] to Elipandus concerning Adoptionism, from a manuscript of 821 commissioned by Bishop [[Baturich]].]]
[[File:Clm 14510, fol. 78r.jpg|thumb|A letter dated to 792 from [[Charlemagne]] to Elipandus concerning Adoptionism, from a manuscript of 821 commissioned by Bishop [[Baturich]].]]
”’Elipandus”'{{efn|Sometimes anglicized ”’Elipand”’; in Spanish, ”’Elipando”’.}} (717–805) was a Spanish [[Christian theology|theologian]] and the [[archbishop of Toledo]] from 782. He was condemned by the [[Catholic Church]] as an [[Spanish Adoptionism|Adoptionist]].
”’Elipandus”'{{efn|Sometimes anglicized ”’Elipand”’; in Spanish, ”’Elipando”’.}} (717–805) was a Spanish [[Christian theology|theologian]] and the [[archbishop of Toledo]] from 782. He was condemned by the [[Catholic Church]] as an [[Spanish Adoptionism|Adoptionist]].
Six letters written by Elipandus survive, including one to [[Migetius]] and another on behalf of the bishops of Spain to the bishops of [[Francia]]. All in all, three of his letters address the Migetian controversy. He credited Bishop [[Ascaric (bishop of Braga)|Ascaric of Braga]] with also fighting the “Migetians”.{{sfn|Cavadini|1988|p=19}}{{sfn|Bullough|1962}}
Six letters written by Elipandus survive, including one to [[Migetius]] and another on behalf of the bishops of Spain to the bishops of [[Francia]]. All in all, three of his letters address the Migetian controversy. He credited Bishop [[Ascaric (bishop of Braga)|Ascaric of Braga]] with also fighting the “Migetians”.{{sfn|Cavadini|1988|p=19}}{{sfn|Bullough|1962}}
Although he affirmed [[Catholicism|Catholic]] teaching that [[Jesus]] is true Son of God, eternally begotten from God the Father and thus of one divine nature with the Father, he also proposed that Jesus, as the son of [[David]], according to his human nature was the adopted rather than the begotten son of [[God]]. Elipandus’s assertion seemed to suggest that Christ’s human nature existed separately from His divine personhood. Thus, it seemed to be a nuanced form of [[Nestorianism]] and came to be known as Adoptionism.{{Citation needed|date=June 2012}}
Although he affirmed [[Catholicism|Catholic]] teaching that [[Jesus]] is true Son of God, eternally begotten from God the Father and thus of one divine nature with the Father, he also proposed that Jesus, as the son of [[David]], according to his human nature was the adopted rather than the begotten son of [[God]]. Elipandus’s assertion seemed to suggest that Christ’s human nature existed separately from His divine personhood. Thus, it seemed to be a nuanced form of [[Nestorianism]] and came to be known as Adoptionism.{{ |date= }}
Elipandus’s teaching was condemned as [[heresy]] by the Councils of Ratisbon in 792 and of Frankfurt in 794. The heresy was rejected by the [[English people|English]] theologian [[Alcuin]] who wrote, among many other works against adoptionism, a ”Treatise against Elipandus” in four books. [[Paulinus II of Aquileia|Paulinus II]] of Aquileia also composed a book refuting Elipandus unorthodox teachings for the Council of Frankfort.{{Citation needed|date=June 2012}}
Elipandus’s teaching was condemned as [[heresy]] by the Councils of Ratisbon in 792 and of Frankfurt in 794. The heresy was rejected by the [[English people|English]] theologian [[Alcuin]] who wrote, among many other works against adoptionism, a ”Treatise against Elipandus” in four books. [[Paulinus II of Aquileia|Paulinus II]] of Aquileia also composed a book refuting Elipandus unorthodox teachings for the Council of Frankfort. =
==Notes==
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
{{notelist}}
==References==
==References==
*{{cite journal |author-link=Donald A. Bullough |first=Donald A. |last=Bullough |title=The Dating of Codex Carolinus Nos. 95, 96, 97, Wilchar, and the Beginnings of the Archbishopric of Sen |journal=Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters |volume=18 |year=1962 |pages=223–230 |url=http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/resolveppn/?PID=GDZPPN000353000}}
*{{cite journal |author-link=Donald A. Bullough |first=Donald A. |last=Bullough |title=The Dating of Codex Carolinus Nos. 95, 96, 97, Wilchar, and the Beginnings of the Archbishopric of Sen |journal=Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters |volume=18 |year=1962 |pages=223–230 |url=http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/resolveppn/?PID=GDZPPN000353000}}
*{{cite thesis |first=John C. |last=Cavadini |title=The Last Christology of the West: Adoptionism in Spain and in Gaul, AD 785–817 |institution=Yale University |year=1988 |type=Doctoral thesis}}
*{{cite thesis |first=John C. |last=Cavadini |title=The Last Christology of the West: Adoptionism in Spain and in Gaul, AD 785–817 |institution=Yale University |year=1988 |type=Doctoral thesis}}
Spanish theologian and archbishop
Elipandus[a] (717–805) was a Spanish theologian and the archbishop of Toledo from 782. He was condemned by the Catholic Church as an Adoptionist.[1]
Six letters written by Elipandus survive, including one to Migetius and another on behalf of the bishops of Spain to the bishops of Francia. All in all, three of his letters address the Migetian controversy. He credited Bishop Ascaric of Braga with also fighting the “Migetians”.
Although he affirmed Catholic teaching that Jesus is true Son of God, eternally begotten from God the Father and thus of one divine nature with the Father, he also proposed that Jesus, as the son of David, according to his human nature was the adopted rather than the begotten son of God. Elipandus’s assertion seemed to suggest that Christ’s human nature existed separately from His divine personhood. Thus, it seemed to be a nuanced form of Nestorianism and came to be known as Adoptionism.[4]
Elipandus’s teaching was condemned as heresy by the Councils of Ratisbon in 792 and of Frankfurt in 794. The heresy was rejected by the English theologian Alcuin who wrote, among many other works against adoptionism, a Treatise against Elipandus in four books. Paulinus II of Aquileia also composed a book refuting Elipandus unorthodox teachings for the Council of Frankfort.[4]
- ^ Sometimes anglicized Elipand; in Spanish, Elipando.
- Bullough, Donald A. (1962). “The Dating of Codex Carolinus Nos. 95, 96, 97, Wilchar, and the Beginnings of the Archbishopric of Sen”. Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters. 18: 223–230.
- Cavadini, John C. (1988). The Last Christology of the West: Adoptionism in Spain and in Gaul, AD 785–817 (Doctoral thesis). Yale University.
- Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Growth of medieval Theology (600–1300). University of Chicago: Chicago, 1978.
- Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi. “Archive: The Complete Works of Bishop Elipandus of Toledo”, aymennjawad.org, July 2021. Corpus of Elipandus’ surviving works in English translation.
