Journal of Historical Review: Difference between revisions

 

Line 32: Line 32:

}}

}}

The ””’Journal of Historical Review””’ was a non-[[peer review]]ed, [[pseudoacademic|pseudoacademi]] periodical focused on promoting [[Holocaust denial]]. It was published by the [[Institute for Historical Review]] (IHR), based in [[Torrance, California]]. It ran quarterly from 1980 until 1992, and then bimonthly from 1993 until publication ceased in 2002. A supplement, ””’IHR Newsletter””’ ({{ISSN|1043-156X}}), was published alongside the journal.

The ””’Journal of Historical Review””’ was a non-[[peer review]]ed, [[pseudoacademic]] periodical focused on promoting [[Holocaust denial]]. It was published by the [[Institute for Historical Review]] (IHR), based in [[Torrance, California]]. It ran quarterly from 1980 until 1992, and then bimonthly from 1993 until publication ceased in 2002. A supplement, ””’IHR Newsletter””’ ({{ISSN|1043-156X}}), was published alongside the journal.

==History ==

==History ==

Pseudocademic journal advancing Holocaust denial

Academic journal

The Journal of Historical Review was a non-peer reviewed, pseudoacademic periodical focused on promoting Holocaust denial. It was published by the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), based in Torrance, California. It ran quarterly from 1980 until 1992, and then bimonthly from 1993 until publication ceased in 2002. A supplement, IHR Newsletter (ISSN 1043-156X), was published alongside the journal.

The journal was founded in 1978 by the far-right political activist Willis Carto.^[1] Its first issue appeared in 1980. Its first editor was David McCalden, who then left the periodical in 1981 after a dispute with Carto. He was replaced by Tom Marcellus, who was replaced in February 1983 with Keith Stimely, until Stimely quit the IHR in February 1985. The impetus for this was his claim that Carto had, without consulting him, removed part of an article by Robert Faurisson that was critical of David Irving (both Holocaust deniers) from the Journal. In 1985, Mark Weber joined the institute’s editorial advisory committee and was made editor of the journal. He was the editor from then until the journal’s end.

Its subject was primarily Holocaust denial,^[7][8][9] though other topics were discussed, if only at times to fill space. In terms of topics covered it was heavily European in orientation, though a majority of its contributors were Americans. The journal published original content but also sometimes reprinted articles from deceased authors to fill space. In an analysis of its contents, historian Stephen E. Atkins found that 34.4% of articles were on exclusively Holocaust denial articles, while “revisionist” history of all kinds was 41.5% of its coverage, and 13% was on topics unrelated to Holocaust denial.

Writer Spencer Sunshine described it as the “premier Holocaust denial publication in the United States”. The journal became a platform for Holocaust deniers around the world, with the editorial board including, among others, Germans Udo Walendy, Wilhelm Stäglich, and Georg Franz-Willing); French Robert Faurisson and Henri Roques; Argentinian W. Beweraggi-Allende, Australian John Tuson Bennett; Spanish Enrique Aynat); Italian Carlo Mattogno; and American M. A. R. Barker.^[10][11]

The journal commenced publication in the spring of 1980 as a quarterly periodical. No issues were published between April 1996 and May 1997.^[12] It continued until 2002, when it became defunct due to financial problems. After publication of the journal ceased, the IHR publishes its Bulletin only in an online format,^[10] although back issues are still made available on the Institute website.^[14]

The Journal’s critics have included the Anti-Defamation League, the Danish Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, and scholars including Robert Hanyok, a National Security Agency historian,^[15] and many others who have described the journal as pseudo-scientific.^[16] Historian Stephen E. Atkins wrote that the contents of the journal were “cleverly intertwined between Holocaust denial and what might be considered as historical revisionism”.

Jonathan Petropoulos wrote in The History Teacher that the “[journal] is shockingly racist and antisemitic: articles on ‘America’s Failed Racial Policy’ and anti-Israel pieces accompany those about gas chambers… They clearly have no business claiming to be a continuation of the revisionist tradition, and should be referred to as ‘Holocaust Deniers’.”^[17]

Russian historians Igor Ryzhov and Maria Borodina commented that the fact that the Institute for Historical Review published its own historical journal “helped not only to unite the deniers into a single movement, but also to give their activities a form of pseudo-scientificness.”^[9] The Organization of American Historians commissioned a study of the journal in which a panel had found that it was “nothing but a masquerade of scholarship”.^[18]