List of spreadsheet mistakes: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 39: Line 39:

|Research on estimating that one-fifth of papers with supplementary material containing Excel gene lists to have erroneous gene name conversions

|Research on estimating that one-fifth of papers with supplementary material containing Excel gene lists to have erroneous gene name conversions

|Automatic formatting

|Automatic formatting

|<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ziemann |first=Mark |last2=Eren |first2=Yotam |last3=El-Osta |first3=Assam |date=2016-08-23 |title=Gene name errors are widespread in the scientific literature |url=http://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-1044-7 |journal=Genome Biology |language=en |volume=17 |issue=1 |doi=10.1186/s13059-016-1044-7 |issn=1474-760X |pmc=4994289 |pmid=27552985}}</ref>

|<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ziemann |first=Mark |last2=Eren |first2=Yotam |last3=El-Osta |first3=Assam |date=2016-08-23 |title=Gene name errors are widespread in the scientific literature |url=http://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-1044-7 |journal=Genome Biology |language=en |volume=17 |issue=1 |doi=10.1186/s13059-016-1044-7 |issn=1474-760X |pmc=4994289 |pmid=27552985}}</ref>

|}

|}


Latest revision as of 18:49, 25 November 2025

Researchers have found that up to 90% of spreadsheets have errors that affect their results.[1]

Below is a list of examples of spreadsheet mistakes that are caused by a variety of reasons.

Date Organization Discrepancy Issue Reference
January 1995 Fidelity Investments A $2.6 billion miscalculation after an accountant accountant omitted the minus sign on a net capital loss of $1.3 billion Omitted minus sign [2]
June 2003 TransAlta A $24 million loss from buying more US power transmission hedging contracts at higher prices Cut and paste issue [3]
October 2008 Barclays Unintentionally revealing 179 contracts Lehman Brothers had intended to trade Hidden columns [4]
May 2012 JPMorgan Chase A $6 billion loss when a Value-at-Risk model was miscalculated Cut and paste issue [5]
August 2016 N/A Research on estimating that one-fifth of papers with supplementary material containing Excel gene lists to have erroneous gene name conversions Automatic formatting [6][7]
  1. ^ “Excel errors: How Microsoft’s spreadsheet may be hazardous to your health”. ZDNET. Retrieved 2025-11-25.
  2. ^ Neumann, Peter G. (1995-01-06). “The RISKS Digest, Volume 16 Issue 72”. The RISKS Digest, Volume 16 Issue 72. 16 (72).
  3. ^ Cullen, Drew (June 19, 2003). “Excel snafu costs firm $24m”. The Register. Archived from the original on 2025-09-08. Retrieved 2025-11-25.
  4. ^ “Barclays Spreadsheet Error Results In Lehman Chaos”. Business Insider. Oct 16, 2008. Retrieved 2025-11-25.
  5. ^ Whittall, Christopher. “Value-at-Risk model masked JP Morgan $2 bln loss”. U.S. Archived from the original on 2023-03-29. Retrieved 2025-11-25.
  6. ^ Ziemann, Mark; Eren, Yotam; El-Osta, Assam (2016-08-23). “Gene name errors are widespread in the scientific literature”. Genome Biology. 17 (1). doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1044-7. ISSN 1474-760X. PMC 4994289. PMID 27552985.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  7. ^ “Scientists rename human genes to stop Microsoft Excel from misreading them as dates”. The Verge. 2020-08-06. Archived from the original on 2022-12-17. Retrieved 2025-11-25.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version