Talk:Bizagi: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project’s importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Article has been adjusted to comply with Wikipedia’s requirements — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrudominguez (talk • contribs) 13:42, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could an editor please help update this article with the new company logo available at www.bizagi.com

Please review and update where you think it useful to the accuracy of the article:
1. Update licence model. Bizagi no longer offers paid plans for Modeler users, so Freemium is not an accurate description. Bizagi Modeler remains available for free, but this is not used to recruit users for the enterprise automation platform because it carries different business goals. https://www.bizagi.com/en/platform/modeler
2. Add Industry to overview box – Enterprise software / Cloud computing
3. Type: BPM – This term is now only one part of the platform as both the BPM category and Bizagi’s platform have expanded beyond that idea to include Low-Code Application Development. Bizagi is primarily used for Low-Code Process Automation.
4. Remove ‘Freeware’ from Bizagi Studio. Bizagi Studio is no longer available as a Freeware application because it now includes Cloud Services for Bizagi’s Enterprise Customers.
5. Add ‘Bizagi Apps’ – this is the part of Bizagi’s platform where the application UI is created that runs on top of the process automation happening underneath.
6. Clean up notes about issues from 2015 regarding primary sources etc. Sue.Allen (talk) 11:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m Tim.Bizagi and I have a conflict of interest because I work for Bizagi. I’m suggesting the following edits for review by neutral editors.

1. I would like to request the removal of old messages regarding the proposed deletion of this article as this has never taken place due to no consensus
2. I would like to request the removal of the message message regarding COI / primary sources. I would like to work with editors to reduce the reliance on primary sources by providing new citations and avoid any COI edits that do not comply with wikipedia guidelines by posting requests here on the talk page.
3. The description of Bizagi’s product set is out of date. Please consider the following updates to better reflect Bizagi’s platform:

Please add the following as bullets under the Bizagi Automation section as additions to the existing information there. These are sub-products that fall within Bizagi Automation:
1. Bizagi Apps – A low-code drag and drop tool for creating custom interfaces as an alternative to the workportal – Citation: https://www.bizagi.com/en/platform/bizagi-apps
2. Bizagi AI Agents – An AI capability enabling customers to automate tasks within a business process using generative AI – Citation: https://www.bizagi.com/en/platform/ai-agents
3. Bizagi AI Workers – An AI feature that prefills forms for humans to validate and submit, without writing a prompt. – Citation: https://www.bizagi.com/en/platform/ai-workers
4. Bizagi AI Assistant (Ada) – An AI chat interface where users can ask questions in natural language about data within the application and receive answers in both text and charts – Citation: https://www.bizagi.com/en/platform/artificial-intelligence
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim.Bizagi (talk • contribs) 14:23, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Tim.Bizagi. Note that I’ve updated your comment to move it to the bottom of the talk page. Generally, new topics should go at the bottom. I’ve also signed your comment for you. When you post to a talk page you almost always should sign the comment by placing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. Lastly, I updated the template from edit request to edit coi, which is the one to use when you have a conflict of interest.

Your first request is about moving historic information from the talk page. Those are kept there as a reference, so if anyone else is thinking about nominating the page for deletion, they will know what happened last time. So those don’t get removed.

The COI/sourcing tag should only be removed when the issues are addressed. So once that happens, that can be looked at.

I’ll leave your last request there for an editor who is familiar with this topic. But I’ll note that all of those sources are to your own website. Secondary sources are generally preferred. See WP:PSTS. This is particularly true if the goal is removing the COI/sourcing tag from the top. So we really should be looking to see what others have said about Bizagi, not what you all have published on your own website.

Happy editing and welcome to Wikipedia! meamemg (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance and advice. Are there any specific points that relate to the COI so that I can know which points require 3rd party sources? I am happy to avoid marketing messages and simply want the article to be accurate and up to date to avoid confusion in the market. For example it says Bizagi is available in Java which has not been true for many years. In the meantime I have another request relating to the logo

== Request to add/update company logo ==

Hello editors, I am employed by Bizagi and wish to request an update to the company’s logo in the infobox. The new logo file is available here https://www.bizagi.com/files/live/sites/bizagi/files/bizagi_logo.svg, meets Wikipedia’s fair use standard, and is the official logo per www.bizagi.com. Can an independent editor review and update the infobox? Thank you! Tim.Bizagi (talk) 14:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: First, sorry you had to wait so long. Sorry if this sounds blunt, not done per meamemg, and primary sources promotional content (we are not really interested in all the products you have to offer). Let me know if you have questions. GoldRomean (talk) 16:03, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I did not create the article originally to include products and I am only interested in it being correct. If it is not possible to request updates to the information about products, which will of course change over time, then can I request that the section is removed so that it does not create confusion? Wikipedia is seen as a trusted source of information, including by LLMs, and therefore displaying incorrect or outdated information will cause confusion for customers and anyone interested in doing business with the company. 2A02:C7C:A0AA:7900:789F:529F:AC9F:7E12 (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in to your account :). I think you might be able to get the logo added if you could upload it properly (but don’t know much about image copyright). Regarding the section, yeah, go ahead :). GoldRomean (talk) 22:07, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also: The deletion tags should stay (they do even if the result is keep) for maintenance purposes. You can make a new request to remove the primary source banner if/when it has been fixed. Cheers. GoldRomean (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]