From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|
3. Yes, it’s an article on a niche industrial chemical drawing from chemistry sources, it will be technical. [[User:RustyOldShip|RustyOldShip]] ([[User talk:RustyOldShip|talk]]) 12:20, 5 February 2026 (UTC) |
3. Yes, it’s an article on a niche industrial chemical drawing from chemistry sources, it will be technical. [[User:RustyOldShip|RustyOldShip]] ([[User talk:RustyOldShip|talk]]) 12:20, 5 February 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
:Hello RustyOldShip, thank you for the detailed clarification. I agree with your points regarding the sourcing and the inherent technicality of the subject. Since the notability is established via chemical databases, I’ll remove the issues tag now. Happy editing! [[User:Mohamed0612|Mohamed Filali]] ([[User talk:Mohamed0612|talk]]) 00:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:23, 6 February 2026
 |
|
1. Everything has a citation already. Please be specific, maybe use [citation needed]?
2. “Butenachlor” appears in many lists of herbicides and many times when discussing chemical groups of similar pesticides, so it is broadly recognised as a herbicide active compound, so it should have a short article with a few basic facts. That it is “obsolete” is nothing great, it still works, but is not currently commercialised. Benzoylprop, for example, was obsolete but re-commercialised in 2017.
3. Yes, it’s an article on a niche industrial chemical drawing from chemistry sources, it will be technical. RustyOldShip (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hello RustyOldShip, thank you for the detailed clarification. I agree with your points regarding the sourcing and the inherent technicality of the subject. Since the notability is established via chemical databases, I’ll remove the issues tag now. Happy editing! Mohamed Filali (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
