From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
|
{{GA|9 October 2025|topic=Agriculture, food and drink|page=1|oldid=1315964289}} |
|||
|
{{GA nominee|13:09, 26 September 2025 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Agriculture, food and drink|status=onreview|note=|shortdesc=Genus of plants (coniferous trees)}} |
|||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=|vital=yes|1= |
||
|
{{WikiProject Forestry|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject Forestry|importance=mid}} |
||
|
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject Plants|importance=mid}} |
||
Latest revision as of 18:01, 9 October 2025
|
Archives |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Cedrus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 13:09, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Bgsu98 (talk · contribs) 22:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
Whoa, whoa, whoa… how did I miss one of your evergreens? 😉 Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:59, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
- In the lead, I would use an adverb in this sentence: “cedar chests were used by…” Perhaps “often”?
- In External phylogeny, I would remove the “the” from “structure to the firs”.
User:Chiswick Chap: This article is very well written, as you can see by the small number of comments I have. Please let me know when you have a chance to go through these, and I will do the source and image reviews as soon as I can. Let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:54, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Bgsu98: all done to date! Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Image review (10/9/25)
[edit]
Source review (10/9/25)
[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
