<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Dice's cottontail/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:”This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Dice's cottontail/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.”</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Dice's cottontail/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:”This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Dice's cottontail/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.”</includeonly>
”’Reviewer:”’ [[User:Simongraham|Simongraham]] ([[User talk:Simongraham|talk]] ”’·”’ [[Special:Contributions/Simongraham|contribs]]) 23:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
”’Reviewer:”’ [[User:Simongraham|]] ([[User talk:Simongraham|talk]] ”’·”’ [[Special:Contributions/Simongraham|contribs]]) 23:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
<!– Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==…==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===…===), level 4 and so on. Template:GAN/preload–>
<!– Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==…==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===…===), level 4 and so on. Template:GAN/preload–>
This looks an interesting article and a cursory glance shows it is likely to be near to meeting the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Good article criteria]] but I will start a full review shortly. [[User talk:simongraham|simongraham]] ([[User talk:simongraham|talk]]) 23:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
This looks an interesting article and a cursory glance shows it is likely to be near to meeting the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|Good article criteria]] but I will start a full review shortly. [[User talk:simongraham|simongraham]] ([[User talk:simongraham|talk]]) 23:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
===Comments===
*First, some general comments
*Overall, the standard of the article is high.
*It is of reasonable length, with 1,057 words of readable prose.
*The lead is short at 74 words.
*Authorship is 82.2% from the nominator with contributions from 24 other editors.
*It is currently assessed as a Start class article, but Rater predicts that it is B class or higher with a score of 87.1%.
*There are some duplicate links, including Central American tapeti and Cordillera de Talamanca.
===Criteria===
The six good article criteria:
# It is reasonable ”’well written”’.
#:the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;{{GAList/check|}}
#:*The writing is clear and appropriate.
#:*I believe that the commas before “and resides” in the lead and “and as endangered” in the body are superfluous as the second clauses have no subject while you could introduce a comma before “and its hind feet are” and similar in other sentences were the second phrase has a subject.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: simongraham (talk · contribs) 23:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
This looks an interesting article and a cursory glance shows it is likely to be near to meeting the Good article criteria but I will start a full review shortly. simongraham (talk) 23:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- First, some general comments
- Overall, the standard of the article is high.
- It is of reasonable length, with 1,057 words of readable prose.
- The lead is short at 74 words.
- Authorship is 82.2% from the nominator with contributions from 24 other editors.
- It is currently assessed as a Start class article, but Rater predicts that it is B class or higher with a score of 87.1%.
- There are some duplicate links, including Central American tapeti and Cordillera de Talamanca.
Criteria
The six good article criteria:
- It is reasonable well written.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- The writing is clear and appropriate.
- I believe that the commas before “and resides” in the lead and “and as endangered” in the body are superfluous as the second clauses have no subject while you could introduce a comma before “and its hind feet are” and similar in other sentences were the second phrase has a subject.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
