Talk:Doukkala: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project’s importance scale. Portugal To-do: Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport’s own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Improve Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests Assess Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project’s importance scale.

Like several other articles about Moroccan regions (e.g. Chaouia (Morocco)), this article is being semi-regularly disrupted by IPs and other editors changing sourced information about ethnic terms and identities. A reminder that Wikipedia is not a forum for discussing personal views or for your own personal beliefs or experiences; all information must be attributed to independent, published, reliable sources. If there’s a problem with the article’s content, please explain it here on the talk page. Do not change or remove information without citing additional reliable sources, and in cases where reliable sources contradict each other, then this should again be discussed on the talk page so that a solution may be determined by consensus. R Prazeres (talk) 03:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tanitsbride: So far, what you’ve said on my talk page ([1]) and in your edit summary ([2]) can only be taken as your personal assessment, which is not how Wikipedia determines content: see Wikipedia:No original research. Moreover, as I said before, the text is well-cited and tells readers who made these estimates, so unless you have other reliable sources stating that these estimates are unreliable, you haven’t provided a convincing reason for deleting content. (And if there are other reliable sources contradicting these, it usually makes more sense to simply add what those sources say to the article and let readers decide what they think of it all, per Wikipedia’s neutral point of view.)

Either way, I would suggest discussing this with Mayouhm, whom I believe added much of this content recently and/or revised much of it. Feel free to use this talk section to do so by responding below. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 17:11, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think there’s much to discuss unless there’s either a reliable source that contradicts the claims by Cornell (and Hart) or directly dismisses it Mayouhm (talk) 17:14, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]