Talk:Here for It All: Difference between revisions

This review is transcluded from Talk:Here for It All/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Zirthes (talk · contribs) 19:57, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Bgsu98 (talk · contribs) 20:40, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello… I will do this review as part of my GA pledge. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:40, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I apologize for the tardiness in beginning this review. I have read the full article; it is very well-written and I made a very small number of edits. There is nothing that you need to do with regards to the prose.

All images have appropriate licenses, captions, and alt-text.

Source review (11/30/25)

This table checks 8 passages from throughout the article (9.9% of 81 total passages).
These passages contain 28 inline citations (25.2% of 111 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:21, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
She released the lead single, “Type Dangerous”, that same month,
7		youtube.com
“Type Dangerous”, the album’s lead single, was described as a “sassier side” to Carey,
21	a	elle.com
“Sugar Sweet” followed and featured American singer Kehlani and Jamaican singer Shenseea.
21	b	elle.com
On June 9, 2025, Carey attended the 2025 BET Awards, where she was honored with the Ultimate Icon Award. During the ceremony, she performed “Type Dangerous” for the first time, as part of a medley with “It’s Like That”.
28		people.com			The article says nothing about a medley with “It’s Like That”.
Carey also performed two concerts in Brazil in September 2025 featuring “Type Dangerous” and “Sugar Sweet” in the setlist, headlining The Town festival in São Paulo on September 13, and the Amazônia Live concert in Belém on September 17.
34		www1.folha.uol.com.br
which also appears as the fourth track on the album.
16	b	billboard.com

User:Zirthes: There is only one discrepancy that I found while doing the source review. Additionally, in the section Singles and videos, the statement “On July 21, 2025, Carey teased a second single titled “Sugar Sweet”” is followed by four citations. That is gross overkill; I strongly recommend paring that back to just one. You might also consider doing the same for the statement “The single, “Type Dangerous” was released on June 6, 2025, alongside a music video directed by Joseph Kahn, which premiered a week later.” one paragraph above.

At the very least, the issue with source no. 28 needs to be addressed, and then I will be happy to pass this for you. Please let me know if you have any questions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for doing this review, I appreciate your comments.

I have corrected the issue with source no. 28, changing the text in the article to “During the ceremony, she performed “Type Dangerous” for the first time, joined by Anderson Paak, who played the drums during the performance.”, which reflects the source accurately and removes the mention of “It’s Like That”.

I have removed two of the citations after “On July 21, 2025, Carey teased a second single titled “Sugar Sweet””. I have also removed one of the citations after “The single, “Type Dangerous” was released on June 6, 2025, alongside a music video directed by Joseph Kahn, which premiered a week later”, as you suggested. Zirthes (talk) 16:42, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:47, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.