From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|
::Being “published” does not mean it will not be taken “back down.” That is why we have AfD. Are you able to show how this meets [[WP:NFF]]? –[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 17:37, 22 October 2025 (UTC) |
::Being “published” does not mean it will not be taken “back down.” That is why we have AfD. Are you able to show how this meets [[WP:NFF]]? –[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 17:37, 22 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:::Since principal photography began, the production has received coverage from [[BBC]], [[Deadline Hollywood]], [[Screen Daily]], and several local newspapers. If that doesn’t establish notability, I don’t know what does. [[User:ThanatosApprentice|ThanatosApprentice]] ([[User talk:ThanatosApprentice|talk]]) 19:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC) |
:::Since principal photography began, the production has received coverage from [[BBC]], [[Deadline Hollywood]], [[Screen Daily]], and several local newspapers. If that doesn’t establish notability, I don’t know what does. [[User:ThanatosApprentice|ThanatosApprentice]] ([[User talk:ThanatosApprentice|talk]]) 19:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::::I agree that it is notable per [[WP:NFF]] since it meets the criteria of having significant coverage and having started filming. The coverage shows that the world at large is already interested in the film, and the start of filming is a threshold indicating much stronger certainty of completion (compared to being stuck in development and never actually getting going). [[User:Erik|Erik]] ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) 20:27, 6 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:27, 6 November 2025
 |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
@Hildreth gazzard and ThanatosApprentice:, wanted to ping you both to discuss notability prior to any AfD. I declined this through AfC as it does not meet WP:NFF. Hoping someone can point me to sources showing the production is somehow notable as I still feel it fails NFF. CNMall41 (talk) 16:47, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- After it was declined I added a notice to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film appealing the decision, but no one has yet responded there. Personally I would’ve waited to re-submit it, but now that it’s published I doubt there will be enough support to take it back down when there’s multiple sources referencing principal production. ThanatosApprentice (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Being “published” does not mean it will not be taken “back down.” That is why we have AfD. Are you able to show how this meets WP:NFF? —CNMall41 (talk) 17:37, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Since principal photography began, the production has received coverage from BBC, Deadline Hollywood, Screen Daily, and several local newspapers. If that doesn’t establish notability, I don’t know what does. ThanatosApprentice (talk) 19:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that it is notable per WP:NFF since it meets the criteria of having significant coverage and having started filming. The coverage shows that the world at large is already interested in the film, and the start of filming is a threshold indicating much stronger certainty of completion (compared to being stuck in development and never actually getting going). Erik (talk | contrib) 20:27, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Since principal photography began, the production has received coverage from BBC, Deadline Hollywood, Screen Daily, and several local newspapers. If that doesn’t establish notability, I don’t know what does. ThanatosApprentice (talk) 19:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Being “published” does not mean it will not be taken “back down.” That is why we have AfD. Are you able to show how this meets WP:NFF? —CNMall41 (talk) 17:37, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
