Talk:Morava Airport: Difference between revisions

Line 18: Line 18:

:All in all, I really don’t know what to say. Maybe we can get some editors from WikiProject Airports to weigh in, see what they think? [[User:JustARandomSquid|JustARandomSquid]] ([[User talk:JustARandomSquid|talk]]) 07:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:Klačko|Klačko]] The very thing I was afraid of happening has happened, which is that someone’s picked up my article for review while it still has an entire unsourced section. Even if your sectioning is better, is it really so good that it’s worth the problems? So either you find a source for the problem section (the one that’s there doesn’t count, some of those units are stationed in Niš), or you give up and let me put it back to how it was. I hope I’m not being unreasonable here, and I’m sure my sectioning isn’t so much worse that you can’t just let it go, and it would mean a lot to me if you did — please?[[User:JustARandomSquid|JustARandomSquid]] ([[User talk:JustARandomSquid|talk]]) 07:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

:::All units listed in that section are stationed in Lađevci – since you claim otherwise, please name those which aren’t… [[User:Klačko|Klačko]] ([[User talk:Klačko|talk]]) 10:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

:{{yo|JustARandomSquid}} I would just look at other GA examples of sectioning out joint military–public airports since that is your goal. An example can be found at [[Fresno Yosemite International Airport]]. ”'[[User:Mccunicano|<span style=”font-family:Helvetica;background:#213458; color:white; padding:2px;”> ❯❯❯ Mccunicano</span>]][[User talk:Mccunicano|<span style=”background:#white; color:white; padding:2px;”>☕️</span>]]”’ 20:21, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Morava Airport is currently a Transport good article nominee. Nominated by JustARandomSquid (talk) at 19:09, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Note: I pledge that when this article’s review finishes, I will find a mentor and review another newbie’s article with their help. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello!

There is currently an ongoing dispute about the sectioning of this article at User talk:Klačko. It would be great if you could weigh in!

Regards, JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klačko, let’s move here so other people can weigh in. I still can’t find any other sources for which military units are stationed there. This kind of exemplifies my problem with your edits, not so much that there’s anything wrong with your sectioning, hell, maybe it’s even better, but that nothing was wrong with mine either, and that we now have other problems, like I said before, if it ain’t broke don’t fix it.

But anyway, CambridgeBayWeather is kind of right, we both want the same thing. Strictly speaking, most joint military-civilian airports don’t really draw too much special attention to the military part. The most I could find is this where it does list the units, but only as a sort of balance to listing Airlines and destinations. So the fact we agree that Lađevci Airbase should have a separate section is already huge.

I liked my revision because it led to more balanced sectioning. I feel like there isn’t much material for a section on the airbase aside from history, so that should be included there too, and the history section should just focus on the civilian history. (Open to renaming it something else, like ‘civilian developments’, or something along those lines.) I’d already added to the airbase section in my revision information about all the units stationed there that I could find sources for, so in your revision the section is either unsourced or redundant, because the same units are repeated multiple times.

All in all, I really don’t know what to say. Maybe we can get some editors from WikiProject Airports to weigh in, see what they think? JustARandomSquid (talk) 07:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klačko The very thing I was afraid of happening has happened, which is that someone’s picked up my article for review while it still has an entire unsourced section. Even if your sectioning is better, is it really so good that it’s worth the problems? So either you find a source for the problem section (the one that’s there doesn’t count, some of those units are stationed in Niš), or you give up and let me put it back to how it was. I hope I’m not being unreasonable here, and I’m sure my sectioning isn’t so much worse that you can’t just let it go, and it would mean a lot to me if you did — please?JustARandomSquid (talk) 07:30, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All units listed in that section are stationed in Lađevci – since you claim otherwise, please name those which aren’t… It’s getting weird your insistence on all of this really. Klačko (talk) 10:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@JustARandomSquid: I would just look at other GA examples of sectioning out joint military–public airports since that is your goal. An example can be found at Fresno Yosemite International Airport. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 20:21, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Morava Airport/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: JustARandomSquid (talk · contribs) 19:09, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 13:10, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This seems interesting. Will review in the next two weeks. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 13:10, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]