Talk:Nothing: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

By /

Line 144: Line 144:

:* ”’Oppose”’. Unnecessary disambiguation, and this is the clear primary topic for the word ”nothing”. Thanks, [[User:1isall|<span style=”color:cyan; background-color:navy;”>1isall</span>]] (he/him) ([[User talk:1isall|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/1isall|contribs]]) 16:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

:* ”’Oppose”’. Unnecessary disambiguation, and this is the clear primary topic for the word ”nothing”. Thanks, [[User:1isall|<span style=”color:cyan; background-color:navy;”>1isall</span>]] (he/him) ([[User talk:1isall|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/1isall|contribs]]) 16:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

* ”’Oppose”’ per [[User:1isall|1isall]]. There is nothing in the encyclopedia that takes primacy of this meaning of the term, so there is nothing that needs to be changed here. [[User:BD2412|<span style=”background:gold”>””’BD2412””'</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|”’T”’]] 17:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

nothing. Removed edit orotection 2A02:810D:8080:2780:D1B2:1C41:7BF8:F51E (talk) 19:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an edit you want done, you can request it.
Simply write {{edit semi-protected}}, then describe the change you want made. Paradoctor (talk) 20:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IP user,there is a reason the page is protected UnsungHistory (Questions or Concerns?) (See how I messed up) 20:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The reason is,it gets blanked a whole lot UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 02:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
lmao 109.166.138.133 (talk) 14:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just don’t, it achieves nothing and annoys a lot of people Speakerset (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, there is a reason why this page is indefinitely extended-protected, as users including those who are autoconfirmed have been blanking this page for so many years. Sometimes extended-confirmed users do that as well for the laughs. If you need to edit this page, feel free to submit an edit request and someone will be here to respond shortly. Cyclonical (talk) 04:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree, I do not understand what they accomplish when they blank it, it is not even funny. A slice of 8.5397342 (talk) 00:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I kind of want to just edit the page and put and the beginning of it ‘Do not delete the contents of this page, it is not funny and it is uncalled for.’ I wish that this would be obvious but clearly it is not. A slice of 8.5397342 (talk) 00:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@A slice of 8.5397342 People don’t usually do such notices. Because even mentioning this type of vandalism can encourage users to try it out for themselves. See this page here: Wikipedia:Don’t stuff beans up your nose. I know it’s a silly essay, of course, but it covers this whole topic, and it’s quite an interesting read to say the least. Cyclonical (talk) 05:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Real 65.31.23.157 (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
real Enter your username is my username 2 (talk) 00:29, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It achieves nothing

I think that’s the point lol I💖平沢唯 (talk) 04:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ILoveHirasawaYui they do not achieve “nothing”, they achieve a reason to get blocked for vandalism UnsungHistory (Questions or Concerns?) (See how I messed up) 20:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

174.103.243.215 (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you want to do to the page? Please be specific – OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
he wants to blank it 2603:6080:D841:50F4:8859:19D8:C939:6150 (talk) 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That’s what I originally thought… – OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Get an account. Then you edit 500 times and wait 30 days after you gain your account. You will gain extended confirmed which will allow you to edit this page Heyitsmekalhan (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism
In hinduism “nothing” is discussed in great detail. It can be found in “Upanishad”. Nothing is a state in which everything exists. It doesn’t need to be born and it never dies because it doesn’t exist yet it exists. “Upanishad” describes the absolute truth of our existence and this absolute truth is “nothing”. It is also described in some other religions too.
[1]

[2] Prasunkatiyar (talk) 14:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it’s not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a “change X to Y” format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move the page to “Concept of Nothing”,it will reduce the chances of vandalism. UnsungHistory (Questions or Concerns?) (See how I messed up) 22:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It will also help disamguate it,Nothing (disambiguation) UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 19:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am Extended Confirmed now….just waiting for another editors opinion on the matter UnsungHistory (Wrong Edit!) 21:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add a section about the history of blanking the page. It’s Wikipedia’s own legacy. Adiiitya (talk) 18:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is unnecessary as you could see it here UnsungHistory (Questions?) (Did I mess up?) 21:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that’s unnecessary. The history of this article’s vandalism isn’t related enough to nothing for it to be worth mentioning. UnsungHistory also makes a good point. It’s already mentioned elsewhere, so why would we need to put it here? – DoofusMcGoofus (talk) 13:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There may be other ways to display it, such as other pages. A brief mention in the List of edit wars on Wikipedia, perhaps? 86.13.247.51 (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Add a sentence saying:
Fun fact, this Wikipedia page has been vandilized over 900 times! Roshambo1234 (talk) 13:07, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done; this article is about the subject, not the Wikipedia article… – OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KoutasYT (talk) 02:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC) there is misinformation in the nothing page[reply]

I am requesting a name change for the article to go from from Nothing to concept of nothing. Changing the name would greatly lower the amount of vandalism and better reflect the articles content. Nootiemcnooterson (talk) 05:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wouldn’t “nothing (concept) fit better with the style of wikipeadia? Skeletons are the axiom (talk) 20:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes however that could cause confusion amongst the general public. Nootiemcnooterson (talk) 23:33, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
how? Skeletons are the axiom (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind your right i just thought it could take away from the articles and direct people away from the article but i think your idea is more logical. Nootiemcnooterson (talk) 23:30, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Would “nothingness” work as a title? Runtape (talk) 02:06, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If a move is being proposed, this should be done through Wikipedia:Requested moves. Is the intent of this proposal to move Nothing (disambiguation) to the current title? BD2412 T 03:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a good idea, a move should be requested. ObsidianCompass (talk) 15:00, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the section “Science” there is a preposition “on” that should be changed to “in”. This is the sentence:

“…1803 interference experiment, seemingly confirming the need for an aether. The most well known attempt to detect the existence of the aether was the Michelson–Morley experiment conducted by Albert A. Michelson on 1881, later repeated with Edward W. Morley in 1887 with more precision. This failed to show the desired…”

This should read “…experiment conducted by Albert A. Michaelson in 1881…”

That’s “in” instead of “on”. Runtape (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply] 

Userofwikiofusa (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Userofwikiofusa No, I don’t think so. That’s vandalism. GimmeKittens (talk) 16:36, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We do a little trolling erase everything

 Not done: it’s not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a “change X to Y” format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 02:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“Some writers have made connections between Heidegger’s concept of nothing and the nirvana of Eastern religions.”

This strikes me as a bit off – Nirvana is the cessation of the cycle of Samsara. The more appropriate concept would be Śūnyatā. The concepts in many Eastern Philosophies are cyclic, so the confusion is understandable. Just pointing this out to help. As a Buddhist this section in general struck me as a little Western-centric Utetwo22 (talk) 08:00, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Utetwo22, I can add that for you if you have sources specifically contradicting the current information. The Blue Rider 11:11, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even with Bluelock, there is still soo much blanking(look in edit history). Should we upgrade it? Heyitsmekalhan (talk) 21:21, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing → Nothing (concept) – The article covers the abstract concept, not other uses: “Nothing (concept)” improves precision and disambiguation. 2A04:CEC0:F04B:6A1:71EA:A9C4:DD08:AE67 (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version