Talk:Pablo Casado: Difference between revisions

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project’s importance scale.

The content I removed was based solely on opinion articles by José Luis Villacañas and Antonio Elorza. While these authors are notable intellectuals, the passages cited represent personal editorial views, not secondary, independent, or neutral analysis.

According to Wikipedia’s policies on biographies of living persons (WP:BLP) and neutral point of view (WP:NPOV), ideological characterizations must be supported by verifiable, high-quality, secondary sources. Personal commentary—especially when unbalanced and not presented alongside alternative views—fails this standard and introduces undue weight.

Unless these opinions are framed in context and balanced with other perspectives (e.g. mainstream political analysts or journalists), their inclusion violates the neutrality principle and should be avoided. I propose either removing them entirely or replacing them with neutral summaries of Casado’s political positioning based on factual reporting (e.g. Reuters, El País, The Guardian).

see links in other languages, eg spanish Ethanbas ^(talk) 10:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is NO excuse for creating a substandard sub-stub like this was. This is a living person and requires at least one reference. Please do not create a mess like this again and expect other editors to do your work. Voceditenore (talk) 12:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that Voceditenore; my other edit apparently didn’t go through. I agree that the initial stub should’ve been longer and contained at least one reference. Ethanbas ^(talk) 13:11, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article uses the term “reactionary” several times to describe Casado’s party. “Reactionary” is at best a subjective evaluation of political positions which do not correspond to the critic’s political taste. In fact, it is more a kind of political battle cry, and there is no use of it in a neutral Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1206:45C8:2BA0:FDF2:4260:37A6:98C8 (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The biological father of Pablo Casado is Joaquin Pi Anguita. Pablo Casado knows it perfectly. Joaquin Pi Anguita (talk) 11:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Joaquin Pi Anguita: And it is also recommended that you get to know perfectly about Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines on disruptive editing and vandalism. I have checked your contributions history and you seem to be introducing this very same information throughout several articles. Note that this amount of evidence could suggest that you are a vandalism-only account should you continue with this behaviour, so it is recommended that you stop such edits. As the incidents have been addressed separately by different users, no warning has been issued, so consider this reply as your first and only warning. Impru20^talk 11:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The section titled “Investigations on his degrees” seems too long. The previous section on his “Early life and education” already says there was controversy about his degrees, and mentions the results of the respective investigations. So I plan to shorten the section titled “Investigations on his degrees”, if there’s no objection. Or we could remove that section entirely, or leave as-is. Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Anythingyouwant (talk) 13:00, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]