From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|
I am a new Wikipedia editor, so forgive me if I am mistaken on this front. I think that this article is fairly interesting, and that is coming from someone with no prior knowledge in the subject matter (naturalist studies, significant figures in the studies). However, I think the article could use a makeover. The entire article is written between two paragraphs and is featured entirely within one section. I imagine it would be better is it was divided into a few, but once again I am new to this community so I would appreciate any input. [[User:LeviticusKash01|LeviticusKash01]] ([[User talk:LeviticusKash01|talk]]) 06:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC) |
I am a new Wikipedia editor, so forgive me if I am mistaken on this front. I think that this article is fairly interesting, and that is coming from someone with no prior knowledge in the subject matter (naturalist studies, significant figures in the studies). However, I think the article could use a makeover. The entire article is written between two paragraphs and is featured entirely within one section. I imagine it would be better is it was divided into a few, but once again I am new to this community so I would appreciate any input. [[User:LeviticusKash01|LeviticusKash01]] ([[User talk:LeviticusKash01|talk]]) 06:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
:Update: I have taken the liberty of reformatting the article like I suggested here in this post nobody interacted with. I have become more familiar with the tools of the site in the past day, so I felt confident enough to do so. However, there is still a lot of work that must be done. Particularly, there needs to be more information added. The French version of the article, which my computer translated to English for me, was filled with far more details and I would like if somebody could adapt the French article to an English version. Like I said, what I did was reformat this article and so I have not verified any of the information in the sources listed. All citations in the new version I made were included in the previous version. [[User:LeviticusKash01|LeviticusKash01]] ([[User talk:LeviticusKash01|talk]]) 06:05, 22 January 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 06:05, 22 January 2026
 |
|
I am a new Wikipedia editor, so forgive me if I am mistaken on this front. I think that this article is fairly interesting, and that is coming from someone with no prior knowledge in the subject matter (naturalist studies, significant figures in the studies). However, I think the article could use a makeover. The entire article is written between two paragraphs and is featured entirely within one section. I imagine it would be better is it was divided into a few, but once again I am new to this community so I would appreciate any input. LeviticusKash01 (talk) 06:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
- Update: I have taken the liberty of reformatting the article like I suggested here in this post nobody interacted with. I have become more familiar with the tools of the site in the past day, so I felt confident enough to do so. However, there is still a lot of work that must be done. Particularly, there needs to be more information added. The French version of the article, which my computer translated to English for me, was filled with far more details and I would like if somebody could adapt the French article to an English version. Like I said, what I did was reformat this article and so I have not verified any of the information in the sources listed. All citations in the new version I made were included in the previous version. LeviticusKash01 (talk) 06:05, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
