From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|
[[:Poilievreism]] → {{no redirect|Political positions of Pierre Poilievre}} – little indication that this term has found widespread use. [[Pierre Poilievre#Political positions]] is fairly long so a standalone page is probably merited, but it should follow [[WP:AT]] (and similar articles for other politicians) —[[User:Rutebega|<span style=”color:#712F47;”>Rutebega</span>]] ([[User_talk:Rutebega|<span style=”color:#988B19;”>talk</span>]]) 19:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC) |
[[:Poilievreism]] → {{no redirect|Political positions of Pierre Poilievre}} – little indication that this term has found widespread use. [[Pierre Poilievre#Political positions]] is fairly long so a standalone page is probably merited, but it should follow [[WP:AT]] (and similar articles for other politicians) —[[User:Rutebega|<span style=”color:#712F47;”>Rutebega</span>]] ([[User_talk:Rutebega|<span style=”color:#988B19;”>talk</span>]]) 19:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:”’comment”’realistically this should be deleted and the section in his article seriously trimmed—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 21:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC) |
:”’comment”’realistically this should be deleted and the section in his article seriously trimmed—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 21:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:”’Keep”’ due to the fact that the Globe and Mail and The Hill Times use the term [[User:Regna sereno intenso ed infinito|Regna sereno intenso ed infinito]] ([[User talk:Regna sereno intenso ed infinito|talk]]) 21:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC) |
:”’Keep”’ due to the fact that the Globe and Mail and The Hill Times use the term [[User:Regna sereno intenso ed infinito|Regna sereno intenso ed infinito]] ([[User talk:Regna sereno intenso ed infinito|talk]]) 21:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::two joking mentions over three years is hardly sustained coverage or use—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 00:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC) |
::two joking mentions over three years is hardly sustained coverage or use—[[user:blindlynx|blindlynx]] 00:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 17:01, 17 October 2025
Poilievreism → Political positions of Pierre Poilievre – little indication that this term has found widespread use. Pierre Poilievre#Political positions is fairly long so a standalone page is probably merited, but it should follow WP:AT (and similar articles for other politicians) —Rutebega (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- comment realistically this should be deleted and the section in his article seriously trimmed—blindlynx 21:10, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Keep due to the fact that the Globe and Mail and The Hill Times use the term Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 21:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- two joking mentions over three years is hardly sustained coverage or use—blindlynx 00:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
