Talk:RespectAbility: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

RespectAbility is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project’s importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because… RespectAbility serves as an advocacy organization for individuals with disabilities both in terms of the workplace and policy development. In addition, the RespectAbility Report disseminates important political pieces, statistics, and other information, as it pertains to individuals with disabilities. In this way, it is very much like newspaper or blog, the type of periodical that is relevant for inclusion in Wikipedia. Furthermore, RespectAbility has been very active in the 2016 Presidential election and has brought awareness on the part of the candidates toward disability issues and development of their own policies.–RockNWrite82 (talk) 21:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This section appears quite tabloid in nature and WP:NOT WP:NOTNEWS.
Maybe close to 10 years ago it was a big deal but now it seems utterly trivial. Anyone else have an opinion on this? PlainJane91 (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Going to delete this as its uncontested PlainJane91 (talk) 10:28, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at it more closely, a number of the references don’t work anymore. This page needs to be brought into 2025. PlainJane91 (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They actually changed their name to this. Should the name of the article be changed accordingly? PlainJane91 (talk) 11:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]