From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|
:Something like 80-90% of the article is referenced using primary sources; any information that can’t be instead verified in reliable third-party sources should be removed. Right now it’s a borderline deletion candidate because anything that makes it notable is hidden. I believe it ”is” potentially a notable subject – mainly as the inventors of HawkEye – but the article is way off the mark currently. [[User:Waggers|<b style=”color:#98F”>W</b><b style=”color:#97E”>a</b><b style=”color:#86D”>g</b><b style=”color:#75C”>ge</b><b style=”color:#83C”>r</b><b style=”color:#728″>s</b>]][[User talk:Waggers|<small style=”color:#080″>”TALK”</small>]] 08:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
:Something like 80-90% of the article is referenced using primary sources; any information that can’t be instead verified in reliable third-party sources should be removed. Right now it’s a borderline deletion candidate because anything that makes it notable is hidden. I believe it ”is” potentially a notable subject – mainly as the inventors of HawkEye – but the article is way off the mark currently. [[User:Waggers|<b style=”color:#98F”>W</b><b style=”color:#97E”>a</b><b style=”color:#86D”>g</b><b style=”color:#75C”>ge</b><b style=”color:#83C”>r</b><b style=”color:#728″>s</b>]][[User talk:Waggers|<small style=”color:#080″>”TALK”</small>]] 08:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
||
|
::Hi Waggers. Just made some amends to the page now. If there are more edits that need to be made to ensure it is within guidelines, reply here and I’ll ensure they are updated. Thank you. [[User:SarahForeland|SarahForeland]] ([[User talk:SarahForeland|talk]]) 17:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:16, 3 December 2025
 |
|
I just came to this article wondering what Roke Manor Research is and found it helpful and neutral. It would be good to have more sources on the specific things developed there. What else needs improving to remove the COI tag?Billlion (talk) 10:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Something like 80-90% of the article is referenced using primary sources; any information that can’t be instead verified in reliable third-party sources should be removed. Right now it’s a borderline deletion candidate because anything that makes it notable is hidden. I believe it is potentially a notable subject – mainly as the inventors of HawkEye – but the article is way off the mark currently. WaggersTALK 08:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Waggers. Just made some amends to the page now. If there are more edits that need to be made to ensure it is within guidelines, reply here and I’ll ensure they are updated. Thank you. SarahForeland (talk) 17:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
