Talk:Rural sociology: Difference between revisions

Line 46: Line 46:

== Probable LLM-generated content with verification issues ==

Hi @[[User:Thomas.5344|Thomas.5344]], your recent expansions to this article contained some [[WP:AISIGNS|signs]] of LLM-generated content, such as editorialization and non-neutral language. More concerning was that I could not find any mention of agricultural economics at all in [https://sk.sagepub.com/hnbk/edvol/sociology/chpt/rural-sociology the only source] you provided for the following claim: {{tqq|It also established agricultural economics as a parallel field, leading to an academic division of labor where economists focused on the farm economy, and rural sociologists studied community, family, and social organization.}} I have reverted these edits in the meantime, but if I have made a mistake, please let me know here. [[User:NicheSports|NicheSports]] ([[User talk:NicheSports|talk]]) 19:38, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Crod333, Juanvz12.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article sounds like it describes a particular school of rural sociology, which seems to have a pessimistic assessment without exception.

Aren’t there positive developments in some places, such as environmental restoration made possible by population shrinkage? Types of rural communities is a partial list of how certain rural communities can prosper economically, and there are others, including focusing on niche crops (specialty organics, biofuel, crops for export, etc.). Farm productivity is high and rising, and so on; some people think that’s a good thing, and that the economic dislocation of small farmers is a temporary burden and that the process is good for the economy and good for consumers (including rural consumers) in the long run. New methods for regenerating renewable natural resources are being used in some places (fish farming instead of fishing natural stocks, sustainable forest management, etc.).

Issues of globalization, the newfound ease with which “digital” can move to low cost-of-living areas, and government subsidies for agriculture are not mentioned. These topics seem to be intimately related to the economics of rural sociology, and represent mixed positive and negative prospects.

Under the section “Economic trends”, it says: “Net cash farm income was projected at US$ 53.7 billion for 1999.” This is not a trend; this is a single data point. Is this higher or lower than the previous years, and what is the trend over many years?

Under the section, “Issues in Rural America”, it says: ‘Fred Buttel asks, “Will we witness a further erosion of commitment to improving the livelihoods of the rural poor?”‘ This seems like a fairly biased political statement that assumes that the government (whatever government that might be; it’s not clear) or voters have an insufficient commitment to the welfare of rural citizens. Many would say that rural Americans in particular have undue influence over national politics, due to the structure of the Electoral College.

Aren’t there also non-economic aspects to rural sociology, like culture and religion?

If this article is supposed to represent a certain school of thought about rural sociology, it should be labelled as such. If it’s supposed to be a general article about the field, it feels like it should reflect a greater diversity of perspectives and opinion.

Perhaps the original author can explain where the material for this article came from, and perhaps others closer to the field can identify the major competing schools of thought so their ideas can be better represented.

The articles listed under “Key topics” seem to have been written in a similar way. —Beland 08:57, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Rewrites have since addressed these concerns; thanks to everyone who helped. — Beland (talk) 17:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve never heard Rural Sociology referred to as such. Is this someone’s idea of a joke? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i never heard it either–it’s now erased. I added a bibliography but confess I’m a rural historian–that field is doing quite well. Rjensen (talk) 14:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Internationally, my perception is that rural sociology is doing very well; in the US, more or less holding its own, but with declining institutional support. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my experience, there are quite a few Rural sociologists who also work in the areas of Development studies, Community studies and Community development. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the US, another area that has been a long-term, steady focus of rural sociology is the important role of women. This relates to the extension aspect of rural sociology: being seen as a ‘conveyor belt’ of scientific information from the academy to rural households, both in farming and, for example, safe home food preservation. In more recent decades this has branched out and developed into an array of emphases, including leadership development, women-led community development and more. Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Thomas.5344, your recent expansions to this article contained some signs of LLM-generated content, such as editorialization and non-neutral language. More concerning was that I could not find any mention of agricultural economics at all in the only source you provided for the following claim: It also established agricultural economics as a parallel field, leading to an academic division of labor where economists focused on the farm economy, and rural sociologists studied community, family, and social organization. This was also the first reference that I checked in the article, which makes me suspect additional verification issues might be present. I have reverted these edits in the meantime, but if I have made a mistake, please let me know here. NicheSports (talk) 19:38, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment