Talk:Saxophone: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 73: Line 73:

The redirect <span class=”plainlinks”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jazz_Tube&redirect=no Jazz Tube]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at ”'{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5#Jazz Tube}}”’ until a consensus is reached. <!– Template:RFDNote –> [[User:Mdewman6|Mdewman6]] ([[User talk:Mdewman6|talk]]) 01:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

The redirect <span class=”plainlinks”>[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jazz_Tube&redirect=no Jazz Tube]</span> has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|redirects for discussion]] to determine whether its use and function meets the [[Wikipedia:Redirect|redirect guidelines]]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at ”'{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5#Jazz Tube}}”’ until a consensus is reached. <!– Template:RFDNote –> [[User:Mdewman6|Mdewman6]] ([[User talk:Mdewman6|talk]]) 01:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

== Additions to the family list ==

== Additions to the family ==

The ephemeral [[Mezzo-soprano saxophone]] is one thing, but the [[C soprano saxophone|C soprano]] and [[C melody saxophone|C melody]] should be in the list. [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2025-31457-60|&#126;2025-31457-60]] ([[User talk:&#126;2025-31457-60|talk]]) 23:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The ephemeral [[Mezzo-soprano saxophone]] is one thing, but the [[C soprano saxophone|C soprano]] and [[C melody saxophone|C melody]] should be in the . [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2025-31457-60|&#126;2025-31457-60]] ([[User talk:&#126;2025-31457-60|talk]]) 23:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 23:56, 9 November 2025

Former featured article Saxophone is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia’s Main Page as Today’s featured article on July 11, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
Date Process Result
January 19, 2004 Refreshing brilliant prose Kept
January 7, 2007 Featured article review Demoted
January 8, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
March 3, 2008 Peer review Reviewed
January 25, 2011 Good article reassessment Delisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia’s Main Page in the On this day… column on May 17, 2004, May 17, 2005, June 28, 2011, June 28, 2013, and June 28, 2016.
Current status: Former featured article

In the article, especially the lede and first section, the “groups” of seven instruments (C/F and B flat/E flat) are called variously “groups”, “categories”, “series” and “families”. I should like to use consistent wording throughout, but I don’t know which is bet to use (I should favour “series”). Does anyone have any opinions? Si Trew (talk)

Given the uncertainty as to whether the “military” and “orchestral” terms were ever applied to the two original series of saxophones, and the superfluous nature of such a debate to understanding the bare facts pertaining to those series, to wit, the Bâ™­ and Eâ™­ series under which most instruments were produced and a small minority of instruments in the C and F series, any reference to those terms in that context seems unnecessary. My only familiarity with “military pitch” is with reference to the High Pitch instruments made for marching bands and “military series” may reflect a conflation of those instruments with the early ones produced in the keys of the modern saxophone family.

The section called “Related instruments” is missing some very important information: why are they even being mentioned? It is already pointed out, quite correctly, that most of these instruments are technically unrelated to saxophones, and are in fact much more like some other instrument. OK – then what’s the point of writing about them? Is it because, even though they are nothing like a saxophone, we have proof that they were inspired by the saxophone, and not inspired by the clarinet or other instruments? That’s great – let’s show the proof. TooManyFingers (talk) 00:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The redirect Neck Strap has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 4 § Neck Strap until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:43, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


The redirect Jazz Tube has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 5 § Jazz Tube until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The ephemeral Mezzo-soprano saxophone is one thing, but the C soprano and C melody should be in the table. ~2025-31457-60 (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top