Talk:Skanderbeg: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


Line 93: Line 93:

== Serbian part ==

== Serbian part ==

I keep getting reverted for re-adding the part which {{ping|Azoral}} added that: “Muzaka further describes Skanderbeg as a man “[[Serbs|Serbian]] in nature”, but according to historian [[Oliver Schmitt]], it remains unclear whether Muzaka meant this in terms of origin or mentality..<ref>{{harvnb|Schmitt|2009|p=27}}: {{blockquote|Der bereits erwähnte Giovanni Musachi bezeichnete Skanderbeg, den berühmtesten Kastriota, als einen Mann, der ‚serbisch von Natur‘ sei.}}</ref>” This was later removed by a user without any proper explanation. I don’t see what’s the problem here? It’s a completely scholarly analysis of a historical document! [[User:Jagjit Karan|Jagjit Karan]] ([[User talk:Jagjit Karan|talk]]) 11:18, 23 October 2025

I keep getting reverted for re-adding the part which {{ping|Azoral}} added that: “Muzaka further describes Skanderbeg as a man “[[Serbs|Serbian]] in nature”, but according to historian [[Oliver Schmitt]], it remains unclear whether Muzaka meant this in terms of origin or mentality..<ref>{{harvnb|Schmitt|2009|p=27}}: {{blockquote|Der bereits erwähnte Giovanni Musachi bezeichnete Skanderbeg, den berühmtesten Kastriota, als einen Mann, der ‚serbisch von Natur‘ sei.}}</ref>” This was later removed by a user without any proper explanation. I don’t see what’s the problem here? It’s a completely scholarly analysis of a historical document! [[User:Jagjit Karan|Jagjit Karan]] ([[User talk:Jagjit Karan|talk]]) 11:18, 23 October 2025

: I can see it was removed by {{ping|Βατο}} for POV-pushing,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skanderbeg&diff=1298721819&oldid=1298720527] and quite frankly, I’d agree with its removal. That quote is not depicted in full for starters, and it is also cited to the wrong page. Furthermore, and most importantly, we have an English translation of [[Gjon Muzaka]]’s memoir, the ‘[[Muzaka Chronicles]]’ – translated by Robert Elsie.[https://www.google.com.au/books/edition/Early_Albania/_sHmTRCEe7kC?hl=en&gbpv=0] Reading it, I cannot see a single line where Gjon Muzaka writes of Skanderbeg as a man “Serbian in nature”, nor does it come up when I search for anything similar. It would seem to be an [[WP:EXTRAORDINARY]] claim that doesn’t even show up in the document that it supposedly comes from… [[User:Botushali|Botushali]] ([[User talk:Botushali|talk]]) 11:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)


Revision as of 11:56, 23 October 2025

Former good article nominee Skanderbeg was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia’s Main Page in the On this day… column on November 28, 2007, November 28, 2008, November 28, 2009, November 28, 2010, November 28, 2011, November 28, 2013, November 28, 2014, November 28, 2016, November 28, 2019, November 28, 2023, and November 28, 2024.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Is it okay if I remove it? Triballiii (talk) 21:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Put it back my friend, this is an evidence. Voisava is a direct child of Brankovic family The true is true (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are the sources used in this article in contradiction with each other? Why do they cite Skanderbeg as a Serbian while the article mentions him as Albanian? 93.86.237.151 (talk) 12:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because there’s good evidence to support that claim, and because this article uses Albanian sources to estsblish his ethnicity, which we have no reason to assume are objective on this matter. Nexxogen (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SKENDREBEU I QI ROBT TURKUT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.156.14.21 (talk) 13:45, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can we use a dot in all image descriptions in this article? Vannucci (talk) 15:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the end of every sentence —Vannucci (talk) 15:47, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Skenderbeg was not Albanian He was Serbian who lived in todays Albanian territory,Albanians didnt had wars against Ottomans, they re ottomans, so dont share Albanian propaganda and protect it. 109.245.38.47 (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: See question 1 in the Frequently Asked Questions at the top of the talk page. Day Creature (talk) 06:15, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I keep getting reverted for re-adding the part which @Azoral: added that: “Muzaka further describes Skanderbeg as a man “Serbian in nature”, but according to historian Oliver Schmitt, it remains unclear whether Muzaka meant this in terms of origin or mentality..[1]” This was later removed by a user without any proper explanation. I don’t see what’s the problem here? It’s a completely scholarly analysis of a historical document! Jagjit Karan (talk) 11:18, 23 October 2025

I can see it was removed by @Βατο: for POV-pushing,[1] and quite frankly, I’d agree with its removal. That quote is not depicted in full for starters, and it is also cited to the wrong page. Furthermore, and most importantly, we have an English translation of Gjon Muzaka‘s memoir, the ‘Muzaka Chronicles‘ – translated by Robert Elsie.[2] Reading it, I cannot see a single line where Gjon Muzaka writes of Skanderbeg as a man “Serbian in nature”, nor does it come up when I search for anything similar. It would seem to be an WP:EXTRAORDINARY claim that doesn’t even show up in the document that it supposedly comes from… Botushali (talk) 11:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Schmitt 2009, p. 27:

    Der bereits erwähnte Giovanni Musachi bezeichnete Skanderbeg, den berühmtesten Kastriota, als einen Mann, der ‚serbisch von Natur‘ sei.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top