Talk:The Amazing Race 8/GA1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 18: Line 18:

=== Production ===

=== Production ===

* I’d link New Jersey on first mention

* I’d link New Jersey on first mention

* The Louisiana cities are missing the state

* The Louisiana cities are missing the state

* I don’t think a casting subheading is needed as the section is only two sentences

* I don’t think a casting subheading is needed as the section is only two sentences

=== Contestants ===

=== Contestants ===


Latest revision as of 20:58, 23 October 2025

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Bgsu98 (talk · contribs) 11:43, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Olliefant (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • “Starting in New York City, racers traveled through New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the District of Columbia, Virginia, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Panama, Costa Rica, Arizona, Utah, Wyoming, Montana, and Canada before finishing in Lewiston, New York.” this could probably be condensed into the starting and ending locations  Done
  • I’m not seeing the Production or Reception sections covered in the lead I did add the production dates to the lead similarly to how the lead in The Amazing Race 1 is set up.
  • Do the clues vary season to season? No, those clue envelopes are consistent from season to season.
  • Also I think its best for them to be sourced, particularly if they vary Everything in that section is sourced to source no. 2 (My Ox is Broken).
  • I’d link New Jersey on first mention I think states are meant to not be linked per MOS:OVERLINK.
  • The Louisiana cities are missing the state  Done
  • I don’t think a casting subheading is needed as the section is only two sentences I’ve relocated that brief section further up.
  • The images are oddly placed, could they be moved elsewhere?
  • I’d link the city in the tables status column
  • What is the relevence of the “Future appearances” section? It just talks about other stuff the cast did
  • I’d merge this with the above section as the table has the results already
  • I’d say this might be too detailed and a possible WP:TVPLOT violation
  • Under “Leg 1 (New York → Pennsylvania & New Jersey)”, list the state after the city names as to make it clear if its NY or PA or NJ (this goes for the other sections as well)
  • “Teams were directed to find a “frank”” this seems like an WP:EASTEREGG
  • “Leg 2 (Pennsylvania → District of Columbia → Virginia)” its called District of Columbia in the subheading but Washington, D.C. in prose. I’d it in the subheading for consistency
  • Link “Bermuda”
  • Is there any viewership info?
  • Cut the “Critical response” subheading
  • I’d break it into two paragraphs starting with “In 2016,”
  • “Producers Bertram van Munster and Jonathan Littman doubt that the family format will be revived in the future” I’d rewrite this as it was stated in 2015
  • Why is “reality blurred” a reliable source?
  • Additonaly several of the “reality blurred” sources incorrectly format the name as “Andy Dehnart” and not “Dehnart, Andy”
  • Also some sources list “Reality Blurred” and others list “reality blurred”
  • Why is “Reality TV World” a reliable source?
  • Why is “Walpole Student Media Network”
  • Ref 20’s title should not be in all caps

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version