From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|
It is common knowledge that the Schwarzschild solution is one of general relativity’s few exact solutions. [[Special:Contributions/2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA|2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA]] ([[User talk:2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA|talk]]) 02:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC) |
It is common knowledge that the Schwarzschild solution is one of general relativity’s few exact solutions. [[Special:Contributions/2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA|2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA]] ([[User talk:2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA|talk]]) 02:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
|
== Regarding “Anomalous precession of Mercury” == |
|||
|
The solution to the problem of attraction to the former position of the Sun should not be to attract to the ”extrapolated instantaneous position”, but rather to the average of where the Sun was seen to be (retarded position) and where it will be (advanced position) when the Sun would see the current position of the planet. [[User:JRSpriggs|JRSpriggs]] ([[User talk:JRSpriggs|talk]]) 14:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:55, 1 October 2025
 |
|
In the first paragraph it is written “but an approximate solution has: the Schwarzschild solution.”
It is common knowledge that the Schwarzschild solution is one of general relativity’s few exact solutions. 2601:1C0:CC00:A180:C5B5:8CA3:D63F:80BA (talk) 02:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
The solution to the problem of attraction to the former position of the Sun should not be to attract to the extrapolated instantaneous position, but rather to the average of where the Sun was seen to be (retarded position) and where it will be (advanced position) when the Sun would see the current position of the planet. JRSpriggs (talk) 14:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
