Talk:Venezuela: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

 

Line 130: Line 130:

The change might seem small but we should strive for the best Wikipedia possible, not just a sloppy, almost version. [[User:Vanguardnew|Vanguardnew]] ([[User talk:Vanguardnew|talk]]) 21:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

The change might seem small but we should strive for the best Wikipedia possible, not just a sloppy, almost version. [[User:Vanguardnew|Vanguardnew]] ([[User talk:Vanguardnew|talk]]) 21:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{done}}:<— Template:Esp —>:, the source says {{tq|”the US”}} so “the United States” can work just fine. [[User:MosquitoDestroyer|MosquitoDestroyer]] ([[User talk:MosquitoDestroyer|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/mosquitoDestroyer|mosquitoes destroyed]]) 22:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

:{{done}}Esp, the source says {{tq|”the US”}} so “the United States” can work just fine. [[User:MosquitoDestroyer|MosquitoDestroyer]] ([[User talk:MosquitoDestroyer|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/mosquitoDestroyer|mosquitoes destroyed]]) 22:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

== Can someone keep an eye on the political situation in Venezuela? ==

== Can someone keep an eye on the political situation in Venezuela? ==

Venezuela was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia’s Main Page in the On this day… column on July 5, 2004, July 5, 2005, July 5, 2006, July 5, 2007, July 5, 2008, July 5, 2009, July 5, 2010, July 5, 2011, July 5, 2012, July 5, 2013, July 5, 2014, and July 5, 2016.
Current status: Former good article nominee

ב״ה, when will the new name be recognized after today’s events? ~2026-48174 (talk) 12:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Given the country’s heavy dependence on oil exports for state revenue, and resulting economic and political turmoil due to fluctuating oil prices, does it count as a Banana republic? AlastairIrvine (talk) 13:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Article currently reads “The president can ask the legislature to reconsider portions of laws he finds objectionable, but a simple parliamentary majority can override these objections.”

Suggest it should read “The president can ask the legislature to reconsider portions of laws the president finds objectionable, but a simple parliamentary majority can override these objections.”

As written, it assumes the president can only be a male.~2025-31128-01 (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I propose adding “American occupation” to the infobox. Ahammed Saad (talk) 17:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

During his press conference today President Trump denounced Venezuela’s VP, and said that America would be leading Venezuela. How should we proceed in that direction? Lightnightx3x (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The fact of the matter is that Wikipedia will have to just wait and see. Obviously, as information is just coming out and there is a lot of chaos regarding the state of things, people are going to jump to claiming “The VP is now acting President” or “Venezuela is under US occupation,” the situation is that we just don’ know right now. It very well could be that Maduro and Rodriguez abdicate and the US takes total control of the government, or Rodriguez could return to Venezuela and order the removal of US troops from the territory, which would be a war over the governing of the state. The third option is that the Venezuelan military comes in and tries to organize a coup against both the current government and the supposedly incoming US leadership.
Trump and his allies can claim whatever they want, it doesn’t make it legal or true. Likewise, Rodriguez can claim leadership in Venezuela, but if she’s in Russia and unable to serve, it doesn’t really mean anything. What matters is how the government actually functions and who is in charge as opposed to what people say or put down on paper as “official” claims.
To answer your question, in short, nobody knows, and we’ll just have to see where things go in the coming days or weeks. ~2026-54331 (talk) 18:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I propose that until the situation around who is president of Venezuela is resolved, we list president in the infobox as “Disputed” with a link to the article about the US air strikes and leave Rodrigues as vice-president in the infobox. Some people are adding her as president without any reliable sources quoted. Dn9ahx (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Trump has only mentioned controlling Venezuela, but has not taken any action yet. Rodriguez’ situation is still unclear, but legally she is still VP. Lightnightx3x (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Maduro is no longer in power. Wikipedia should change the info box, removing Maduro.
The box where Maduro’s name is now should show:
1. (blank)
2. unknown
3. in flux
There should be a Wikipedia discussion and vote. I have no opinion except I know it’s not Maduro. Vanguardnew (talk) 21:00, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Venezuela is currently under U.S. Occupation, following the United States utilizing military force under Operation Midnight Hammer. Venezuela will temporarily held by the United States for the time being.

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). Fox News

Editor: GodlyOutput(Username) ~2026-55768 (talk) 17:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it’s not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a “change X to Y” format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. This is already mentioned in the “American administration of Venezuela” subsection. Day Creature (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Aren’t we jumping the gun a bit by replacing dictatorship with provisional government within a day of Maduro being booted? ~2025-33494-05 (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. We need to wait until sources confirm. ErickTheMerrick (talk) 18:38, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This source says that Delcy Rodríguez has been sworn in as interim president accoridng to two people close to the government speaking under anonymity, but I would say to wait for further confirmation and sources. ErickTheMerrick (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In the History section under Bolivarian government under Maduro: 2013–2026 there is a paragraph that begins with “In June 2020, a report documented enforced disappearances that occurred in 2018–19. Some 724 enforced disappearances of political detainees were reported.”

Can the following sentence be added to the end of this paragraph: “According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), between 2016 and 2019, Venezuela’s security forces killed over 19,000 people for alleged “resistance to authority”. HRW stated that evidence showed that many of the killings were extrajudicial executions.”

The following source should be added: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2023/country-chapters/venezuela ~2026-58313 (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done MosquitoDestroyer (talk | mosquitoes destroyed) 21:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Current version:
Post-Maduro (2026–present)
In January 2026, following increasing tensions between the United States and the Venezuelan government, the United States launched airstrikes across the coastline of Venezuela as part of Operation Southern Spear. President Donald Trump announced in a post on social media that Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro had been captured and flown out of the country.[165] In a later post, Trump said that the US will “run” Venezuela until a safe transition of the country’s leadership can take place.[166]

Requested version (change in the last sentence):
Post-Maduro (2026–present)
In January 2026, following increasing tensions between the United States and the Venezuelan government, the United States launched airstrikes across the coastline of Venezuela as part of Operation Southern Spear. President Donald Trump announced in a post on social media that Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro had been captured and flown out of the country.[165] In a later post, Trump said that the United States will “run” Venezuela until a safe transition of the country’s leadership can take place.[166]

Alternative acceptable version (change in the last sentence):
Post-Maduro (2026–present)
In January 2026, following increasing tensions between the United States and the Venezuelan government, the United States launched airstrikes across the coastline of Venezuela as part of Operation Southern Spear. President Donald Trump announced in a post on social media that Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro had been captured and flown out of the country.[165] In a later post, Trump said that the U.S. will “run” Venezuela until a safe transition of the country’s leadership can take place.[166]

The change might seem small but we should strive for the best Wikipedia possible, not just a sloppy, almost version. Vanguardnew (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, the source says “the US” so “the United States” can work just fine. MosquitoDestroyer (talk | mosquitoes destroyed) 22:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It is suspected that the US may occupy (“run”) Venezuela, of which the possibility has been confirmed by the UN. Can someone keep an eye on this country’s status in case the US goes forward with “running” Venezuela?

Maybe the government can be changed from “authoritarian dictatorship” to a form of occupation or simply a lack of actual leadership, but I personally think more information should come out, but you may think otherwise, which I’d like to hear your thoughts. Videominer (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Article currently reads “The president can ask the legislature to reconsider portions of laws he finds objectionable, but a simple parliamentary majority can override these objections.”

Suggest it should read “The president can ask the legislature to reconsider portions of laws the president finds objectionable, but a simple parliamentary majority can override these objections.”

As written, it assumes the president can only be a male.~2025-31128-01 (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done but instead of saying “the president” again I changed it to the gender-neutral they. ✨ΩmegaMantis✨❦blather | ☞spy on me 21:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version