Talk:William Street tunnel/GA1: Difference between revisions

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 09:59, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Mdm.Bla (talk · contribs) 01:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article for Good article status. This is my first time performing a GA review, but I will do my best. My initial assessment is that the article does not quick-fail, so a more detailed assessment will be put together in the next few days. Feel free to ping me with questions. mdm.bla 01:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

   The author is the only non-bot contributor listed in the page history. The article has not been edited since October 4 and has a total of 21 edits since its creation in May. This article is stable and passes criterion 5 of the good article criteria. mdm.bla 01:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: