From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough. Long enough. Reliable citations throughout. Well written. No copyright violations per Earwig. Hook is cited and interesting. My only question is about the alternative spellings Birindji and Ikindci, used in one of the citations. Birindji is mentioned in the caption but I think both Birindji and Ikindci should be mentioned. Other than that, it’s good to go. [[User:Hybernator|Hybernator]] ([[User talk:Hybernator|talk]]) 02:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC) |
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough. Long enough. Reliable citations throughout. Well written. No copyright violations per Earwig. Hook is cited and interesting. My only question is about the alternative spellings Birindji and Ikindci, used in one of the citations. Birindji is mentioned in the caption but I think both Birindji and Ikindci should be mentioned. Other than that, it’s good to go. [[User:Hybernator|Hybernator]] ([[User talk:Hybernator|talk]]) 02:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
** {{ping|Hybernator}} Thanks for the review! Just to clarify, you think ”Birinci İnönü” and” İkinci İnönü ” should be included in the hook? I am not sure which citation you refer to, but I believe the alternate spellings are due to the Western sources lacking the İ character. The current spelling is the same style seen in articles such as [[İsmet İnönü]] and [[İnönü, Eskişehir]]. [[User:GGOTCC|GGOTCC]] 03:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC) |
** {{ping|Hybernator}} Thanks for the review! Just to clarify, you think ”Birinci İnönü” and” İkinci İnönü ” should be included in the hook? I am not sure which citation you refer to, but I believe the alternate spellings are due to the Western sources lacking the İ character. The current spelling is the same style seen in articles such as [[İsmet İnönü]] and [[İnönü, Eskişehir]]. [[User:GGOTCC|GGOTCC]] 03:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*** No. They don’t need to be in the hook but should be included the article. Thanks. [[User:Hybernator|Hybernator]] ([[User talk:Hybernator|talk]]) 03:29, 22 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
|
{{-}}}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–> |
{{-}}}}<!–Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.–> |
||
Latest revision as of 03:30, 22 October 2025
Birinci İnönü-class submarine
One of two Birinci İnönü-class submarines
- Source: [Turkey] Birinci İnönü-class submarine
Builder: Fijenoord (Amsterdam)
Notes: The Ingenieurskantoor voor Scheepsbouw (IvS) in The Netherlands developed this design as an update of the wartime UB-III type…
Page 194 of Submarines: An Illustrated History of their Impact by Paul E. Fontenoy
GGOTCC 14:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC).
- @Hybernator: Thanks for the review! Just to clarify, you think Birinci İnönü and İkinci İnönü should be included in the hook? I am not sure which citation you refer to, but I believe the alternate spellings are due to the Western sources lacking the İ character. The current spelling is the same style seen in articles such as İsmet İnönü and İnönü, Eskişehir. GGOTCC 03:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- No. They don’t need to be in the hook but should be included the article. Thanks. Hybernator (talk) 03:29, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Hybernator: Thanks for the review! Just to clarify, you think Birinci İnönü and İkinci İnönü should be included in the hook? I am not sure which citation you refer to, but I believe the alternate spellings are due to the Western sources lacking the İ character. The current spelling is the same style seen in articles such as İsmet İnönü and İnönü, Eskişehir. GGOTCC 03:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
