Template:Did you know nominations/My Choice (film): Difference between revisions

My Choice (film)

• … that 2015 film My Choice says, “My body, my mind, my choice; To wear the clothes I like; even if my spirit roams naked; My choice;..”?

• • ALT1: … that “…Your mind is caged, let it free. My body is not, let it be … My choice: to love a man, or a woman, or both. Remember, you are my choice. I’m not your privilege. …” is from 2015 Film My Choice?
  • Source: Secondary:Washington Post
    Primary: My choice acting Deepika Padukone Directed by Homi Adajania (Youtube)

• • ALT3:… that The rise of neoliberal feminism, as seen in film My Choice, stems from complex gender constructions across states, markets, and civil societies encompassing multiple ideological intersections?
  • Source: Secondary: Chakraborty, Gauri D. (24 March 2023). “6. New Feminist Visibilities and Sisterhood: Re-interpreting Marriage Desire and Self-Fulfillment in mainstream Hindi Cinema” (PDF). In Chakraborty Paunksnis, Runa; Paunksnis, Šarūnas (eds.). Gender, Cinema, Streaming Platforms: Shifting Frames in Neoliberal India. Germany: Springer International Publishing. pp. 154, 155. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16700-3_6. ISBN 978-3-031-16700-3

Bookku (talk) 03:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC).

• Also (from previous own comment):” To those having music related curiosity Alt2 might sound relatively more interesting, but this DYK’s purpose is to focus on the film and not the music. I hope reviewers will take note of this aspect while taking the call.”

Bookku (talk) 04:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

• I want to suggest ALT5: … that the film My Choice features 99 women, but is less than 3 minutes long? —Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I find this quite interesting. Bookku (talk) 08:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Though for Alt5 we will need to consider two different different sentences from secondary source or form a sentence from primary source per MOS:FILMPLOT. As such WP:CALC says:

“.. Routine calculations do not count as original research, provided there is consensus among editors that the results of the calculations are correct, and a meaningful reflection of the sources. Basic arithmetic, such as adding numbers, converting units, or calculating a person’s age, is almost always permissible. ..”

. Here in case of Alt5 we are not even calculating but we are just presenting the numerical facts, that should work, IMO Bookku (talk) 09:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

https://web.archive.org/web/20220516225923/http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc59.2019/KhannaNeolibFemGaze/text.html (Jump Cut), cited in the article, says, “The two-and-a-half minute film begins with slow shots cutting between a seemingly heterogenous group of 99 women.” That should be sufficient to support the entire ALT5. —Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Yes, You are right, Many thanks for looking into the article in so nuanced way and pointing this out. Bookku (talk) 11:17, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bookku and Metropolitan90: What else needs doing here?–Launchballer 16:33, 25 November 2025 (UTC)