From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|
::::I read your message. A person must possess an account that is 30 days old with 500 edits to edit about Indian military history and also South Asian social groups. A terrorist group or attack would seem to fall within those restrictions. If you want to dispute the restrictions, [[WP:AE]] is the forum. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
::::I read your message. A person must possess an account that is 30 days old with 500 edits to edit about Indian military history and also South Asian social groups. A terrorist group or attack would seem to fall within those restrictions. If you want to dispute the restrictions, [[WP:AE]] is the forum. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:::::Sir was bracketing a terrorist pigs group like let with India’s paramilitary CRPF right? Was calling it a social group remotely fair? Was equating an attack on innocent civilians being repulsed by the country’s paramilitary the same as a battle fought man to man on the border? I never edited the Article OR its Talk OR its Afd. I responded to him on his Talk. AND Sir, please note that the article was not tagged. If you visit the Afd you will see a longtime Admin Anachronist who says that he does NOT think AE applies to it. So that is rather subjective. Even if its one Admin’s unilateral decision what about how he has soft-pedalled on those dirty terrorists? And the insult of India’s AF??? Not a word of rebuke even for that? SO he won’t take back his words? [[Special:Contributions/2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7|2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7]] ([[User talk:2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7#top|talk]]) 20:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
:::::Sir was bracketing a terrorist pigs group like let with India’s paramilitary CRPF right? Was calling it a social group remotely fair? Was equating an attack on innocent civilians being repulsed by the country’s paramilitary the same as a battle fought man to man on the border? I never edited the Article OR its Talk OR its Afd. I responded to him on his Talk. AND Sir, please note that the article was not tagged. If you visit the Afd you will see a longtime Admin Anachronist who says that he does NOT think AE applies to it. So that is rather subjective. Even if its one Admin’s unilateral decision what about how he has soft-pedalled on those dirty terrorists? And the insult of India’s AF??? Not a word of rebuke even for that? SO he won’t take back his words? [[Special:Contributions/2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7|2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7]] ([[User talk:2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7#top|talk]]) 20:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::::::My advice to you is to stop pursuing this. However, you may make an unblock request. If you can get an admin to agree with you, they may unblock you without asking me. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 20:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
|
: ”If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]”.<!– Template:uw-disruptblock –> |
: ”If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]] and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]]”.<!– Template:uw-disruptblock –> |
||
Latest revision as of 20:47, 26 October 2025
- Reason? You were among those I pinged. Did you read the message? What was exactly wrong with my actions? 2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7 (talk) 20:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Your…..statement….being removed the first time should have given you a clue. WP:RGW. 331dot (talk) 20:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly I have never seen this “WP” before. I was asked by one of the people who rv my post on the Admin actions review page to take it to ANI. As Wiki always says that we should all assume good faith please briefly explain to me what was the wrong thing? Why can it not be posted in ANI? Is the terror outfit like l-e-t to be taken on par with India’s paramilitary? is that l-e-t a social group? Was protection warranted on the basis of the rationale presented by the Admin? I say this – on my very life – that I have no clue. I took it to Administrator actions page. I was asked to take it to ANI which is what I did. And PLEASE KINDLY answer if you read my message. 2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7 (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- I read your message. A person must possess an account that is 30 days old with 500 edits to edit about Indian military history and also South Asian social groups. A terrorist group or attack would seem to fall within those restrictions. If you want to dispute the restrictions, WP:AE is the forum. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sir was bracketing a terrorist pigs group like let with India’s paramilitary CRPF right? Was calling it a social group remotely fair? Was equating an attack on innocent civilians being repulsed by the country’s paramilitary the same as a battle fought man to man on the border? I never edited the Article OR its Talk OR its Afd. I responded to him on his Talk. AND Sir, please note that the article was not tagged. If you visit the Afd you will see a longtime Admin Anachronist who says that he does NOT think AE applies to it. So that is rather subjective. Even if its one Admin’s unilateral decision what about how he has soft-pedalled on those dirty terrorists? And the insult of India’s AF??? Not a word of rebuke even for that? SO he won’t take back his words? 2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7 (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- My advice to you is to stop pursuing this. However, you may make an unblock request. If you can get an admin to agree with you, they may unblock you without asking me. 331dot (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sir was bracketing a terrorist pigs group like let with India’s paramilitary CRPF right? Was calling it a social group remotely fair? Was equating an attack on innocent civilians being repulsed by the country’s paramilitary the same as a battle fought man to man on the border? I never edited the Article OR its Talk OR its Afd. I responded to him on his Talk. AND Sir, please note that the article was not tagged. If you visit the Afd you will see a longtime Admin Anachronist who says that he does NOT think AE applies to it. So that is rather subjective. Even if its one Admin’s unilateral decision what about how he has soft-pedalled on those dirty terrorists? And the insult of India’s AF??? Not a word of rebuke even for that? SO he won’t take back his words? 2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7 (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- I read your message. A person must possess an account that is 30 days old with 500 edits to edit about Indian military history and also South Asian social groups. A terrorist group or attack would seem to fall within those restrictions. If you want to dispute the restrictions, WP:AE is the forum. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Honestly I have never seen this “WP” before. I was asked by one of the people who rv my post on the Admin actions review page to take it to ANI. As Wiki always says that we should all assume good faith please briefly explain to me what was the wrong thing? Why can it not be posted in ANI? Is the terror outfit like l-e-t to be taken on par with India’s paramilitary? is that l-e-t a social group? Was protection warranted on the basis of the rationale presented by the Admin? I say this – on my very life – that I have no clue. I took it to Administrator actions page. I was asked to take it to ANI which is what I did. And PLEASE KINDLY answer if you read my message. 2001:4490:4045:106D:9868:7B63:AA8D:FEB7 (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Your…..statement….being removed the first time should have given you a clue. WP:RGW. 331dot (talk) 20:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
