User talk:~2025-31254-81: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 28: Line 28:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sankei_Shimbun#References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sankei_Shimbun#References

Sources 14 to 18 all say right wing. [[Special:Contributions/~2025-33041-03|~2025-33041-03]] ([[User talk:~2025-33041-03|talk]]) 12:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Sources 14 to 18 all say right wing. [[Special:Contributions/~2025-33041-03|~2025-33041-03]] ([[User talk:~2025-33041-03|talk]]) 12:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==

[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia’s policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!–Template:An3-notice–> Thank you. [[User:Sariel Xilo|Sariel Xilo]] ([[User talk:Sariel Xilo|talk]]) 22:46, 13 November 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 22:46, 13 November 2025

Hi ~2025-31254-81! I noticed that you’ve made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Assassin’s Creed Shadows. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you’re aware of Wikipedia’s edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you’re doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Assassin’s Creed Shadows, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors’ changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 02:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Assassin’s Creed Shadows shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page’s content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor’s work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. Sariel Xilo (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to Yasuke, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Nil🥝 04:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sankei_Shimbun#References
Sources 14 to 18 all say right wing. ~2025-33041-03 (talk) 12:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia’s policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:46, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version