User talk:~2025-35689-92: Difference between revisions

Hello, I’m 77qq. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Neda Ukraden have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 77qq (talk) 19:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“Could you explain what gives you the authority to undo my edits? I’d like to understand why my contributions were reverted.” ~2025-35689-92 (talk) 13:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“Why is it even possible for just anyone to change what’s written?” ~2025-35689-92 (talk) 13:02, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neda Ukraden. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neda Ukraden, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Neda Ukraden was changed by ~2025-35689-92 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864341 on 2025-11-26T20:26:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia’s biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Neda Ukraden. ^LaffyTaffer💬(she/they) 20:35, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]