User talk:~2025-36451-70: Difference between revisions

Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1: Line 1:

I have asked you before to desist from your disruptive edit vandalism. My edits were fully supported by independent scholarly sources. Wikipedia is a publically accessible and editable encyclopedia not a personal blog for insecure and petty minded who want to prevent the circulation of new information because they feel threatened by the substance and style of this information and the person who has provided it. You yourself have been extensively criticised on Reddit and elsewhere online as being someone who vandalised without justification other peoples’ edits on Wikipedia because of your own personal issues and preferences, particularly on topics related to Morocco and Algeria.

== November 2025 ==

== November 2025 ==

I have asked you before to desist from your disruptive edit vandalism. My edits were fully supported by independent scholarly sources. Wikipedia is a publically accessible and editable encyclopedia not a personal blog for insecure and petty minded who want to prevent the circulation of new information because they feel threatened by the substance and style of this information and the person who has provided it. You yourself have been extensively criticised on Reddit and elsewhere online as being someone who vandalised without justification other peoples’ edits on Wikipedia because of your own personal issues and preferences, particularly on topics related to Morocco and Algeria.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pieds-noirs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 13:18, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There doesn’t need to be a single verifiable source to be given here in the lead for each and every smaller European ethnic community who settled in French Algeria, just like no source was given for the main ethnic groups. There are enough verifiable and accessible sources in publication and online referring to the ethnic groups I have added.
Please stop being so pedantic and disruptive. It suggests that you have a personal issue or grudge against one or more of these particular ethnic groups. ~2025-36451-70 (talk) 17:55, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While we don’t need to source what is easily attributable, we certainly need them for what isn’t, especially if it has been challenged. Also worth noting: not everything belongs in the WP:LEAD. M.Bitton (talk) 18:18, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at French Algeria, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at French Algeria. M.Bitton (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you’ve made to Pieds-noirs. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:23, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 18:52, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@~2025-36451-70: in addition to the warnings above, please see my edit summary here for suggestions on how you can proceed. What you should NOT do, as the warnings above explain, is repeat your reverted edits without discussing and reaching agreement with other editors on a talk page. Even if you don’t like how other editors reacted to your edits, set it aside and focus your comments instead on the content of the article itself and on relevant reliable sources. R Prazeres (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Greeks in France, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For a start, the source about “Corsican Greeks” is unreliable (it’s literally based on Wikipedia and a blog). Second, as I explained above, not everything belongs in the lead, so even if properly sourced, what you added wouldn’t belong there as it will be WP:UNDUE. Third, it’s also redundant since “Greek Corsicans” were “Corsicans” and “Corsicans” were already French at that time. M.Bitton (talk) 00:45, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@~2025-36451-70: You’ve also knowingly made another unsourced edit at Hussein Dey ([1]) and it seems like you’ve been doing this type of thing for weeks (comparing with edits like this and other edits by that IP, which can only be you or someone linked to you). At this point, these edits would justify reporting you to administrators and requesting a block on your IPs unless you radically change your behaviour immediately. R Prazeres (talk) 19:35, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It seems your latest edit-warring ([2], [3]) are your answer the above. R Prazeres (talk) 00:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Temp account user unsourced edits/edit-warring across many articles. R Prazeres (talk) 01:33, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a real question, no tricks: why are you here at Wikipedia, and what do you hope to accomplish? If you are serious about wanting to contribute here, I would like to hear about some of your interests, and about what topic areas, or what articles you wish to work on next. Can you share the names of a few articles you are interested in contributing to? If you genuinely are here to help improve Wikipedia, it looks like you are going to need some, help, and there is plenty of help available if you know where to look. I encourage you to start by asking questions at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, or the Wikipedia:Help desk. But do let me know your interests, and I’ll have some other ideas for you. Mathglot (talk) 09:07, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version