User talk:~2025-37120-26: Difference between revisions

Line 45: Line 45:

:What did you mean by that [[Special:Contributions/~2025-37120-26|~2025-37120-26]] ([[User talk:~2025-37120-26|talk]]) 02:22, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

::I think that is pretty plain. Go to an article’s talk page, open a new conversation, & give your reasons why an image should be changed. If there is consensus for the change, then it can happen. If not, the status quo will prevail. This will be true for virtually all US presidential infobox images. [[User:Peaceray|Peaceray]] ([[User talk:Peaceray|talk]]) 03:18, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I do get the Martin Van Buren one but the others I didn’t see what was wrong and I didn’t see the messages peachera

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this temporary account, ~2025-37120-26, has made edits to Martin Van Buren that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia’s policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions.

You don’t have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, a temporary account is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Again, welcome! Peaceray (talk) 00:58, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ~2025-37120-26! I noticed that you’ve made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Martin Van Buren. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you’re aware of Wikipedia’s edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you’re doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Martin Van Buren, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors’ changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. You have already been directed to read Talk:Martin Van Buren/Archive 2#Rfc for Martin Van Buren’s Lede Image. Peaceray (talk) 00:59, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James K. Polk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Millard Fillmore, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Franklin Pierce. Peaceray (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see the messages and I get what was wrong with Van Buren but I edited that to show him DURING his presidency and the other ones don’t give an estimate of when a photo was taken but shows EXACTLY what they looked like during there presidency and I’m sorry ~2025-37120-26 (talk) 01:20, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may discuss your proposed edits & get consensus on the talk pages for each article. Otherwise WP:EDITCONSENSUS prevails on US presidential infobox images. Peaceray (talk) 01:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Huh ~2025-37120-26 (talk) 01:34, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What did you mean by that ~2025-37120-26 (talk) 02:22, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think that is pretty plain. Go to an article’s talk page, open a new conversation, & give your reasons why an image should be changed. If there is consensus for the change, then it can happen. If not, the status quo will prevail. This will be true for virtually all US presidential infobox images. Peaceray (talk) 03:18, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please unblock me ~2025-37120-26 (talk) 02:23, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to try to add photos of people who don’t have photos on their Wikipedia page ~2025-37120-26 (talk) 02:27, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply