User talk:~2025-40276-14: Difference between revisions

Yamla, I have yet to appeal with my original account. So please don’t let anyone block me yet for evading a block.

Hello, I’m Qwerty123M, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Online Safety Amendment, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia’s policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:24, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Online Safety Amendment. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Adding a citation needed tag doesn’t make things any better if you’re not actually providing a source. You’re not complying with policies fully and that’s considered vandalism. Your language also sounds very biased. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:28, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I didn’t know it violated Wikipedia’s policies. ~2025-40276-14 (talk) 10:33, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not block me, because I have yet to appeal on February 19 2026 when my ban from UTRS appeals is lifted after administrators were confused by my wording. ~2025-40276-14 (talk) 10:34, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]