Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed you recently marked an edit as “minor” when it may not have been. On Wikipedia, the “minor edit” feature should be used only when an edit cannot be construed to change the meaning of the article’s content, such as fixing typos or correcting formatting. Using this feature correctly helps maintain transparency and ensures other editors can accurately assess the nature of your edits. For future edits, please ensure that you only mark truly minor changes as “minor.” If you have any questions or need clarification, feel free to reach out or review the [[Help:Minor edit|Wikipedia guideline on minor edits]]. Thanks for your understanding and continued contributions! [[User:Significa liberdade|Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small>]] ([[User talk:Significa liberdade|talk]]) 23:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed you recently marked an edit as “minor” when it may not have been. On Wikipedia, the “minor edit” feature should be used only when an edit cannot be construed to change the meaning of the article’s content, such as fixing typos or correcting formatting. Using this feature correctly helps maintain transparency and ensures other editors can accurately assess the nature of your edits. For future edits, please ensure that you only mark truly minor changes as “minor.” If you have any questions or need clarification, feel free to reach out or review the [[Help:Minor edit|Wikipedia guideline on minor edits]]. Thanks for your understanding and continued contributions! [[User:Significa liberdade|Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small>]] ([[User talk:Significa liberdade|talk]]) 23:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
:Hi, thank you for pointing this out and for the reminder! I appreciate the clarification on the use of the “minor edit” feature. I’ll make sure to only mark edits as minor when they truly don’t affect the article’s meaning going forward. Thanks again for guiding me through the right editing practices—I want to keep improving and contributing in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines.
:Best regards,
:4ordables [[Special:Contributions/2600:4040:2579:E100:F0C1:E47A:5D8F:D98B|2600:4040:2579:E100:F0C1:E47A:5D8F:D98B]] ([[User talk:2600:4040:2579:E100:F0C1:E47A:5D8F:D98B|talk]]) 23:22, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
|
Hello, 4ordables!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC) |
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, 4ordables. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, “US-Nigeria Investment Summit“.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Ji11720 (talk) 16:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Qriss-Henry Ogwu. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 20:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Qriss-Henry Ogwu. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, 4ordables. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Qriss-Henry Ogwu“.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed you recently marked an edit as “minor” when it may not have been. On Wikipedia, the “minor edit” feature should be used only when an edit cannot be construed to change the meaning of the article’s content, such as fixing typos or correcting formatting. Using this feature correctly helps maintain transparency and ensures other editors can accurately assess the nature of your edits. For future edits, please ensure that you only mark truly minor changes as “minor.” If you have any questions or need clarification, feel free to reach out or review the Wikipedia guideline on minor edits. Thanks for your understanding and continued contributions! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for pointing this out and for the reminder! I appreciate the clarification on the use of the “minor edit” feature. I’ll make sure to only mark edits as minor when they truly don’t affect the article’s meaning going forward. Thanks again for guiding me through the right editing practices—I want to keep improving and contributing in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines.
- Best regards,
- 4ordables 2600:4040:2579:E100:F0C1:E47A:5D8F:D98B (talk) 23:22, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

