User talk:Ahmad87861: Difference between revisions

 

Line 12: Line 12:

}}

}}

{{unblock|reason=thank you sir for your response, i want to show a humble request and requesting to unblock my account because the guidelines i violeted now i understand the actual reason, there was no solid and notable refrences for the indivisual i was tring to create a wikipedia page, i was a new bee in the wikipedia free contributor community, now i understand and i found out all the notable and acceptable news outlets and articles for the indivisual “Alam sher”, please give me a chance and unblock my account, i want to become a free contributor and wikipedia and want to create pages and help build the wikipedia more accurately, ill appreciate that and ill be thankful, if i repeat the same mistake again here in wikipedia, you can permanently block my account, but for now just give me a chance and unblock my account so i can continue editing further pages, thank you

{{unblock|reason=thank you sir for your response, i want to show a humble request and requesting to unblock my account because the guidelines i violeted now i understand the actual reason, there was no solid and notable refrences for the indivisual i was tring to create a wikipedia page, i was a new bee in the wikipedia free contributor community, now i understand and i found out all the notable and acceptable news outlets and articles for the indivisual “Alam sher”, please give me a chance and unblock my account, i want to become a free contributor and wikipedia and want to create pages and help build the wikipedia more accurately, ill appreciate that and ill be thankful, if i repeat the same mistake again here in wikipedia, you can permanently block my account, but for now just give me a chance and unblock my account so i can continue editing further pages, thank you

[[User:Ahmad87861|Ahmad87861]] ([[User talk:Ahmad87861#top|talk]]) 12:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)}}

[[User:Ahmad87861|Ahmad87861]] ([[User talk:Ahmad87861#top|talk]]) 12:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)}}

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad87861 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I respectfully request the reconsideration of the block placed on my account. I now understand that my previous edits, especially the article about “Alamsher”, were interpreted as promotional and not aligned with Wikipedia’s content policies. I sincerely apologize for any misuse of the platform.

I want to clarify that I have no personal or financial relationship with the individual mentioned in the article. My goal was simply to contribute content I believed to be valuable. However, I now realize I did not meet the standards expected for notability and reliable sourcing at the time.

Since then, I’ve carefully reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability, neutrality, and conflict of interest. I have also collected multiple reliable, independent sources that support the notability of the subject, should the topic be reconsidered in the future.

I kindly ask for a second chance to contribute in good faith and in full compliance with Wikipedia’s rules. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Ahmad87861 (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was AI generated(100% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you directly. An AI cannot tell us what is inside your mind. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 11:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad87861 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

thank you sir for your response, i want to show a humble request and requesting to unblock my account because the guidelines i violeted now i understand the actual reason, there was no solid and notable refrences for the indivisual i was tring to create a wikipedia page, i was a new bee in the wikipedia free contributor community, now i understand and i found out all the notable and acceptable news outlets and articles for the indivisual “Alam sher”, please give me a chance and unblock my account, i want to become a free contributor and wikipedia and want to create pages and help build the wikipedia more accurately, ill appreciate that and ill be thankful, if i repeat the same mistake again here in wikipedia, you can permanently block my account, but for now just give me a chance and unblock my account so i can continue editing further pages, thank you

Ahmad87861 (talk) 12:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Please do not do so again. —Yamla (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll be honest here. Looking at the talk page messages you removed from the page, I’m disinclined to accept the standard “I’m sorry, I didn’t know.” You received a lot of feedback from editors at Articles for Creation and received many warnings before being blocked. As such, you will need to convince administrators you would be responsive to feedback if unblocked. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was also hoping the user would broach the subject of their sock account AzharHussain369 (which filed its own appeal a few days ago, both on their talk and on UTRS), but since they haven’t, I’m mentioning it. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:41, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad87861 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hi admin its ahmad, i didnt knew that removing old unblock was not allowed, i was just tryna make new one coz i thot i messed the first one. sry for that. i get it now. and about my main block, i knw wat i did wrong and i learned about using good sources now. i wont do same mistake again. plz give me 1 more chance i just wana edit normal and help here. thx alot for reading Ahmad87861 (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad87861 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hi admin this is ahmad again i really want to say sry for all the mess i made before i know i got alot of warnings but at that time i was new here and i really didnt know how wikipedia system and talk page works i didnt even knew where to see the msgs and warnings from other editors i was just a new bee and made mistakes i understand that now i learn it all and i promise from my heart i will never repeat that again in my life i know what i did and i feel bad for that i respect all admins and editors and now i am mentally and physically mature enough to follow every rule and guidline i just want a chance to show i can be a good helper and normal editor if i ever do same mistake again you can block me forever but please unblock me this one last time thank you so much for reading this

Ahmad87861 (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the block evasion with AzharHussain369, I am declining this unblock request (and the other open request). As Yamla has revoked talk page access, future unblock requests will need to go through UTRS. Please only request an unblock on one account — the one you plan to stick with. However, I do not recommend submitting another unblock request for at least six months (see standard offer. In that time, do not edit the English Wikipedia at all: no other accounts, no logged out editing. During that time, you may edit other Wiki projects, such as Simple Wikipedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ahmad87861 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hi admin its ahmad again i saw the msg about my other acc azharhussain369 yea that was me i made it coz i was too confused and sad i wanted to fix my mistakes and edit again i swear i didnt knew its not allowed to make new acc while blocked i thought its just like making new one fresh but now i fully understand it was wrong im really sorry for that i never wanted to cheat the system or disrespect any rules i just really wanted to be part of wikipedia and help in right way i learned my lessons hard way now plz forgive me this time i promise i will follow all rules and never repeat this ever again thank u so much for reading and giving me time

Ahmad87861 (talk) 20:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top