User talk:Ajitsinghbhagat: Difference between revisions

Hello, Ajitsinghbhagat!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don’t be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It’s normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don’t worry if you don’t understand everything at first—it’s fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article’s talk page. Be civil, and don’t restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to JioHotstar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 03:45, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to JioHotstar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 04:08, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disney Star. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Detailed Reason :
1. Removing large amounts of content (over 1600 characters) requires a valid reason based on Wikipedia policy (see WP:Preserve). “Font is too big” is not a valid reason; font issues are fixed differently, not by deleting content. Please explain on the article’s talk page if you believe the content should be removed for a valid reason.
2. Adding a “==JioStar ==” heading suggests a name or scope change for the article. Such changes require strong reliable sources WP:V, WP:RS confirming the entire entity has been renamed, and typically involve discussion and potentially a page move request WP:Move, not just adding a header. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 11:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma talk 06:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajitsinghbhagat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Baqi:) (talk) 11:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Bihar Gramin Bank. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 08:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Disney+ Hotstar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GoldRomean (talk) 16:21, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user subpage at User:Ajitsinghbhagat may not meet Wikipedia’s user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into JioStar India. This is known as a “cut-and-paste move“, and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the “Move” tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. RachelTensions (talk) 03:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Disney Star. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Erasing the protection templates does not remove the protection. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 03:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Disney Star, you may be blocked from editing. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 03:35, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am really really sorry.but you know that this page belongs to JioStar not Disney Star. If you can help me to do this I will appreciate it. Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 03:38, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is consensus against this article’s title being changed to that target. I will not be moving it, and it should not be moved without a new discussion. See Talk:Disney Star for why. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 03:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because you continue to change the scope of the article against consensus, as you did here, consider this to be your final warning. There is no consensus for these changes or to move the article, so any further attempts to do so will constitute in a report to administrators. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 15:28, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Template:Disney Star. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. You NEED to WP:Drop the stick and accept that the present consensus is not in favor of a rename. While WP:Consensus can change, persistently forcing a move of the template or the article by unconventional means against that consensus when you wholly know it is contested is disruptive behavior. You also know it was not an obvious “misspelling”, as you so-called it in your edit summary. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 05:08, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. RachelTensions (talk) 05:19, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to start a discussion of JioStar and Disney Star at Talk:Disney Star. Either discuss there, or don’t discuss. Your requests elsewhere are a distraction. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:24, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanilla Wizard was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at JioStar instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

 Vanilla  Wizard 💙 23:01, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajitsinghbhagat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you’ve made to Disney Star. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article’s talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Final warning on changing this without consensus. You have used the talk page so please continue to do so without disrupting current consensus. CNMall41 (talk) 19:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users’ talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence User talk:Jack Wylde. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia’s principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Final warning on canvassing. Next time it will be reported. Not sure how else to convey this to you. CNMall41 (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another one for which you are already aware. —CNMall41 (talk) 16:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And this makes three. —CNMall41 (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: If you think Ajit and Spitfire are the same person, I would suggest looking into opening an SPI into this prolonged disruption and likely abuse. I have to say the two accounts’ editing patterns and behavior draw quite a few similarities. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 17:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The bludgeoning and the canvassing has gone on way too long and should have already been reported. I am hoping they see the light and knock off the disruption. If not, then ANI and SPI is where this will wind up.–CNMall41 (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it’s not we are not same person, definitely not. If we are same person then why I will message spitfire to edit JioStar few months back. What type of man are you? Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What type of comment is that and how is that warranted? You have been uncivil to myself and CNMall from the very start. You need to stop. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 17:29, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am really sorry from both of you if I hurt you. but you also think about before commenting on someone.

One more time I am really really sorry. Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We have both tried our best to remain constructive and assume good faith in our discussions with you, and we have already warned you far beyond what is normally acceptable. You know better by now, and yet you, Spitfire, and others still persist. It may be time for you to think things through and take some time away. It has nothing to do with mine or others’ personal feelings, but it comes down to following Wikipedia user conduct and content policies and guidelines. This whole ordeal has been blown way out of proportion for this entire year, and I truly find it difficult to see anything changing from either side anytime soon. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 17:52, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ajitsinghbhagat, moving this note here from my message at Disney Star § Issues with recent probable LLM-generated edits. I’d ask you to be more careful with your editing and suggest that you avoid using LLMs in the future. We do not currently have policies preventing the use of LLMs in articles, but any use of them must be done in compliance with wikipedia policies, which as you can see from the issues I documented at the talk page is difficult to do. NicheSports (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]