User talk:AmatureHistorian47: Difference between revisions

Hi AmatureHistorian47! I noticed your contributions to EN World and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~Liancetalk 22:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Helen Crigger Cemetery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can’t be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I’ve moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of “Draft:” before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Poplar Tree Lake, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. doozy (talkcontribs)⫸ 03:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Sumanuil. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Calvary Cemetery (Memphis), but you didn’t provide a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:57, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Poplar Tree Lake, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AmatureHistorian47,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Poplar Tree Lake for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn’t be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mekomo (talk) 07:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rinkenberger Cemetery. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Rsjaffe. An edit that you recently made to Almiron S. Cole seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Almiron S. Cole. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:30, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmatureHistorian47,

Thank you for creating Franklin Street Lower Free Bridge.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Did you use a large language model to write this article? It appears that at least some part of § Steel-Truss Bascule (1913-1992) was written using ChatGPT.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dan Leonard}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 03:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed in a few of your articles you have been putting punctuation behind inline references. However, according to the Manual of Style, the punctuation belongs before the reference(s). It would be great if you could change that, thanks 🙂 (sorry for asking this of you instead of doing it myself, I’m a little busy at the moment)cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 13:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for the notice, I will change this mistake in my existing articles and will do my best to adhere to the standards in the future. I am new to editing on Wikipedia and appreciate the learning moment.
~AmatureHistorian
AmatureHistorian47 (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if this is bothering you – I also noticed that some of your pages don’t use “Sentence case” for headers (the correct format per MOS:Head, which also applies to article titles) as well as not being the correct type of header. The first should be clearly explained by the link, but what I mean by the second is that you should use the second largest headings (denoted by == text == in source editing) not the third (=== text ===). In visual editor I think those are called “heading” and “subheading” – heading should be used, with subheadings for heading sections. Oh and one final thing (sorry for bothering you), this is a case-by-case judgement based thing which you’ll know better than me about, but when unnecessary, Wikipedia prefers not to have disambiguation in parentheses in article titles. So basically, in case you didn’t know, if the title disambiguator is doing something other than make it clear you’re reading the right article, it doesn’t need to be there. Have a nice day 🙂 —cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester) 22:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Great Duck Pileup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Great Duck Pileup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Isaidnoway (talk) 13:21, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page David H. McClugage, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page USCGC Melvin Bell (WPC-1155), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Lyndaship. An edit that you recently made to HMS Ariguani seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lyndaship (talk) 07:25, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page David Perkins (golfer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:10, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AmatureHistorian47. Thank you for your work on HNoMS Gnist. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawn Contact me! 09:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Please don’t mark edits as minor that are not WP:MINOREDITs, as you did here. Adding content is never a minor edit. It’s actually ok to never mark edits as minor. Happy editing! Paradoctor (talk) 06:27, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmatureHistorian47,

Thank you for creating German patrol boat Bad Bramstedt.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating this page! I’ve reviewed it and left a tag for copy editing, as there are numerous grammatical errors in the otherwise good article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Nfutvol}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

nf utvol (talk) 01:25, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bone Lake (Wisconsin), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Calvary Cemetery (Memphis). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 10:30, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Timothy J. Ruopp. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 01:57, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Parkview Cemetery (Peoria). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 09:56, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AmatureHistorian47. Thank you for your work on USCGC Sangamon. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for taking the time and energy to create the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawn Contact me! 06:51, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmatureHistorian47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Helen Crigger Cemetery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmatureHistorian47. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rinkenberger Cemetery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmatureHistorian47. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Helen Crigger Cemetery“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:54, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version