User talk:Andymwood73: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 34: Line 34:

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

:Nil,

:I appreciate the speedy feedback. This is my first attempt at creating a reference for a red link; I expected a couple of rounds of helpful critique.

:I’ve gone through the text again, and looked to enhance the citation points.

:Onwards and upwards 🙂 [[User:Andymwood73|Andymwood73]] ([[User talk:Andymwood73#top|talk]]) 13:59, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

== Links ==

== Links ==


Latest revision as of 13:59, 20 October 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sunderland have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sunderland was changed by Andymwood73 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854265 on 2023-12-30T19:21:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sunderland, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A “bare URL and missing title” error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Nil🥝 02:31, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andymwood73!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nil🥝 02:31, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nil,
I appreciate the speedy feedback. This is my first attempt at creating a reference for a red link; I expected a couple of rounds of helpful critique.
I’ve gone through the text again, and looked to enhance the citation points.
Onwards and upwards 🙂 Andymwood73 (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the links inside the article Sunderland. I have fixed the ones that you added (several times) so that they don’t include the underscore “_” or a redirect using the pipe “|”. It’s a great help if you don’t create work for other people. Do shout out if you need help. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:28, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version