User talk:Anjukkanju777: Difference between revisions

:thank you for the guidance. i will do as suggested [[User:Anjukkanju777|Anjukkanju777]] ([[User talk:Anjukkanju777#top|talk]]) 16:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

:thank you for the guidance. i will do as suggested [[User:Anjukkanju777|Anjukkanju777]] ([[User talk:Anjukkanju777#top|talk]]) 16:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Stephanie Matto|Stephanie Matto]] (November 21) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Paul W was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ”significant” coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ”published”, [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources that are ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

—

–>&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Multiple references appear to originate in news releases, interviews or similar publicity generated by Matto – they therefore do not amount to genuine significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking (per [[WP:GNG]]). Previous reviewer’s LLM concerns also still apply (noting the vague and generalist wording in “Other ventures” and “Reception”, for example).}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Stephanie Matto]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Stephanie_Matto ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul_W&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Stephanie_Matto ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Paul W|Paul W]] ([[User talk:Paul W|talk]]) 09:44, 21 November 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia and www.linkedin.com are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:41, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anjukkanju777! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:41, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so uch for the support. i will edit and resubmit the entry with more relavant citations Anjukkanju777 (talk) 09:53, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Thilsebatti (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Owais Khursheed was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 10:03, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This person is Director of Major ISRO centre, VSSC. I have added 5-6 major news paper articles showing his notabiity. And all the previous Directors of the centre has thier wikipedia pages. Wht more you expect to cite? Anjukkanju777 (talk) 10:12, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i mean i added enough indian media citations. Anjukkanju777 (talk) 10:21, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources and routine business reporting (appointment news etc.) do not establish notability per WP:GNG. If notability per WP:NPROF is being claimed, please indicate which of the eight criteria in WP:NACADEMIC is met, and provide clear evidence in support of this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:17, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:24, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Being the head of an ordinary department doesn’t make one notable. See WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

bonadea contributions talk 13:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anjukkanju777. Thank you for your work on Manmohan G. Vaidya. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start! Please fix the citation style – including several errors in footnotes – and fix the bare URLs. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. Fixing it. Anjukkanju777 (talk) 09:13, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anjukkanju777. Thank you for your work on Sunil Ambekar. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:20, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support and encouragement! Anjukkanju777 (talk) 09:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:32, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Manmohan G. Vaidya when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:23, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the guidance. i will do as suggested Anjukkanju777 (talk) 16:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul W was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Multiple references appear to originate in news releases, interviews or similar publicity generated by Matto – they therefore do not amount to genuine significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking (per WP:GNG). Previous reviewer’s LLM concerns also still apply (noting the vague and generalist wording in “Other ventures” and “Reception”, for example).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Paul W (talk) 09:44, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]