User talk:Anoymusk: Difference between revisions

::Start with [[Wikipedia:Golden Rule]], which is short and easy to read, and tells you exactly what kind of sources are needed. Then read [[WP:NACTOR]] and explain, citing sources, what criteria the person meets.

::Start with [[Wikipedia:Golden Rule]], which is short and easy to read, and tells you exactly what kind of sources are needed. Then read [[WP:NACTOR]] and explain, citing sources, what criteria the person meets.

::And finally, don’t let an AI / LLM do your writing for you. They don’t know how to write Wikipedia articles. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 03:24, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

::And finally, don’t let an AI / LLM do your writing for you. They don’t know how to write Wikipedia articles. ~[[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] (who / me) <small>([[User talk:Anachronist|talk]])</small> 03:24, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

:::Hi,

:::There are about a 100 policies and each rejection is giving a different one. Ive tried reaching out since yesterday, have reworked on all rejections. I am not heavily relying on AIs, i have gathered information by speaking to said artist, then done all the research by myself. Have watched all the movies, series available online. I cant watch the theatre shows because they were held in a different cities and countries. I have given the maximum information available as per the guidelines. All i am asking is to view it with a neutral angle. Wiki has given space to many lesser known artist, why do an established one is being rejected is my only question. [[User:Anoymusk|Anoymusk]] ([[User talk:Anoymusk#top|talk]]) 03:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Shahab Ali|Shahab Ali]] (December 3) ==

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Shahab Ali|Shahab Ali]] (December 3) ==

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mentor,

Thank you for reviewing my earlier submission. I have revised the article to ensure it is a complete encyclopedic draft and not a test edit.

The article now documents Shahab Ali’s work as an artist across theatre, feature films, short films, and web series, supported by independent, reliable national media sources such as Hindustan Times, The Times of India, NDTV, OTTplay, and The News Minute.

His graduation from Maharaja Agrasen College, University of Delhi, and the National School of Drama (NSD), New Delhi, along with his long-standing involvement in theatre and screen work over more than sixteen years, are now clearly sourced.

I have ensured a neutral tone, full structure, and compliance with Wikipedia’s biography and sourcing guidelines.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Anoymusk (talk) 18:09, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anoymusk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

UtherSRG (talk) 14:52, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 15:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi why is the article rejected again Anoymusk (talk) 15:13, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is declined (not yet accepted into main article space due to the reasons given above), not rejected (which means you would be asked to stop work on the draft). Please read the notice above, including clicking the provided links to answer the question you have asked. – UtherSRG (talk) 17:36, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Anoymusk! I’m UtherSRG, and I’ve been assigned as your mentor. All new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I’m here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I’m glad you’re here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It’s recommended that you take advantage of this, as it’ll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the “Get editing help” button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia! UtherSRG (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mentor,

Please help me, i am trying to create a page for a known artist who is doing theatre and movies for a decade and half. There are pages for lesser known artist and i personally believe this artist needs the recognition which he will get from a trusted and verified source like Wikipedia. Anoymusk (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have not demonstrated the subject’s notability. I, and multiple other editors, have provided you several links to read and understand. You’ve quickly made new edits to the draft, demonstrating that you haven’t understood the advise given, nor our policies. Please read the provided assistance more carefully and take your time to understand what is required. – UtherSRG (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you completely failed to read the instructions on the page Wikipedia:Third opinion. You are not in a dispute with one other editor.

I suggest you actually read what other people are telling you, and take the time to follow the links people are giving you and actually read those documents linked.

Start with Wikipedia:Golden Rule, which is short and easy to read, and tells you exactly what kind of sources are needed. Then read WP:NACTOR and explain, citing sources, what criteria the person meets.

And finally, don’t let an AI / LLM do your writing for you. They don’t know how to write Wikipedia articles. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 03:24, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

There are about a 100 policies and each rejection is giving a different one. Ive tried reaching out since yesterday, have reworked on all rejections. I am not heavily relying on AIs, i have gathered information by speaking to said artist, then done all the research by myself. Have watched all the movies, series available online. I cant watch the theatre shows because they were held in a different cities and countries. I have given the maximum information available as per the guidelines. All i am asking is to view it with a neutral angle. Wiki has given space to many lesser known artist, why do an established one is being rejected is my only question. Anoymusk (talk) 03:42, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Your references do not demonstrate that Ali passes WP:NACTOR. IMDB may not be used. The others are interviews and PR churnalism

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]