{{unblock|I understand what I have been blocked for and will make useful contribution for sure. }}
{{unblock|I understand what I have been blocked for and will make useful contribution for sure. }}
:Copying and pasting text from the decline of your previous appeal does not inspire confidence in your sincerity or comprehension. [[User:Cabayi|Cabayi]] ([[User talk:Cabayi|talk]]) 09:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
:Copying and pasting text from the decline of your previous appeal does not inspire confidence in your sincerity or comprehension. [[User:Cabayi|Cabayi]] ([[User talk:Cabayi|talk]]) 09:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
{{unblock|I respectfully request a review of the block placed on my wikipedia account. I understand that my recent edits may not have fully complied with Wikipedia’s policies, and I sincerely regret this oversight.I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will strictly follow all Wikipedia policies and guidelines and avoid any promotional edits }}
Hello, Astha Bharti Jha!
I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.
- Don’t be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It’s normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don’t worry if you don’t understand everything at first—it’s fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article’s talk page. Be civil, and don’t restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ScrabbleTiles were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
 |
Hello, Astha Bharti Jha!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ScrabbleTiles (talk) 07:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. Pushkar Misra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 09:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Thanks for your contributions to Pushkar Misra. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Better sources are required rather than more sources. I an not persuaded that [[WP:NPOLITICIAN] is passed..
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 14:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: The comment the reviewer left was:
Citations must be located at the fact you use them to cite, not grouped in a much in thin air
You need better sources, certainly nt an increaed number of them
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 14:56, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pushkar Misra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushkar Misra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 09:26, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
- It was your right to move this back to mainspace, but you did not prove notability. Thus we are now having a deletion discussion instead of your being able to improve it in peace and quiet as a draft and resubmit for review. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 09:29, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Pushkar Misra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 11:09, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Deb (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Astha Bharti Jha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I will follow wikipedia’s guidelines
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Cabayi (talk) 09:06, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Astha Bharti Jha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I understand what I have been blocked for and will make useful contribution for sure.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand what I have been blocked for and will make useful contribution for sure. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand what I have been blocked for and will make useful contribution for sure. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand what I have been blocked for and will make useful contribution for sure. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Copying and pasting text from the decline of your previous appeal does not inspire confidence in your sincerity or comprehension. Cabayi (talk) 09:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Astha Bharti Jha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I respectfully request a review of the block placed on my wikipedia account. I understand that my recent edits may not have fully complied with Wikipedia’s policies, and I sincerely regret this oversight.I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will strictly follow all Wikipedia policies and guidelines and avoid any promotional edits
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I respectfully request a review of the block placed on my wikipedia account. I understand that my recent edits may not have fully complied with Wikipedia's policies, and I sincerely regret this oversight.I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will strictly follow all Wikipedia policies and guidelines and avoid any promotional edits |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I respectfully request a review of the block placed on my wikipedia account. I understand that my recent edits may not have fully complied with Wikipedia's policies, and I sincerely regret this oversight.I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will strictly follow all Wikipedia policies and guidelines and avoid any promotional edits |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I respectfully request a review of the block placed on my wikipedia account. I understand that my recent edits may not have fully complied with Wikipedia's policies, and I sincerely regret this oversight.I assure you that if my account is unblocked, I will strictly follow all Wikipedia policies and guidelines and avoid any promotional edits |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
