From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
 |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|
Additionally, closing discussions is a complex process typically reserved for experienced editors, as it requires assessing consensus based on policy. Please revert your close and let an independent editor review the discussion. Thanks! <span style=”background:#373A36;padding:1.5px 1.5px;font-family:Fira Code;box-shadow:5px 5px 15px #373A36″>[[User:Esb5415|<span style=”color:#000″>””’ESB””'</span>]][[User talk:Esb5415|<span style=”color:#FDB719″>””’5415””'</span>]]</span> 13:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
Additionally, closing discussions is a complex process typically reserved for experienced editors, as it requires assessing consensus based on policy. Please revert your close and let an independent editor review the discussion. Thanks! <span style=”background:#373A36;padding:1.5px 1.5px;font-family:Fira Code;box-shadow:5px 5px 15px #373A36″>[[User:Esb5415|<span style=”color:#000″>””’ESB””'</span>]][[User talk:Esb5415|<span style=”color:#FDB719″>””’5415””'</span>]]</span> 13:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
||
|
:Sorry. Was unaware of that. Thought the discussion being started by a sockpuppet made it eligible for closure. Regarding reverting it, it appears that it was already reverted before I saw this. [[User:Astronaut74539|Astronaut74539]] ([[User talk:Astronaut74539#top|talk]]) 03:31, 4 February 2026 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 03:31, 4 February 2026
Hi! I noticed you closed the merge discussion on Talk:Wide Right II (Buffalo Bills). As the creator of the page, you are considered an “involved” editor. Wikipedia policies require that discussions be closed by a neutral third party to ensure fairness (see WP:NACINV and WP:INVOLVED).
Additionally, closing discussions is a complex process typically reserved for experienced editors, as it requires assessing consensus based on policy. Please revert your close and let an independent editor review the discussion. Thanks! ESB5415 13:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry. Was unaware of that. Thought the discussion being started by a sockpuppet made it eligible for closure. Regarding reverting it, it appears that it was already reverted before I saw this. Astronaut74539 (talk) 03:31, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
